Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting Article/Discussion on Ray Lewis


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

I admit, I'm a Ray Lewis fan... At least the Ray Lewis we've all come to know since the Atlanta incident. BUT, I've always had questions. It feels like I'm wrong for pulling for him IF he did indeed kill two individuals... In fact, it doesn't feel just as though I shouldn't be a fan, but rather I should despise him because in my mind, there is no redeeming a murder. Murderers (non-self-defense/unprovoked) and child molesters are the filth of the earth in my mind.

Yet, I have no resolution on the issue because we DON'T KNOW what happened with certainty. So, I default to being a fan because everything since then has said nothing but what a high-quality individual he is.

It's always been an interesting dilemma. So, this morning, I log on Facebook and Bonnie Bernstein, who I started following after an interesting piece she wrote on the Penn St. stuff awhile back, gives her take on my feed:

276616_170302823055385_914964778_q.jpg

Bonnie Bernstein

13 hours ago

True story: One day (long... long ago) during my middle school years, I snuck into the forest with my friends. Some of my classmates were going through this experimental phase with cigarettes. I hung out, but never took a single puff. No desire. Never one to succumb to peer pressure.

My parents weren't around when I got home, so I quickly threw my clothes in the wash. I was worried they'd make assumptions if they smelled the smoke that had permeated my jeans and jacket.

When Mom got back, I told her I was just hangin out with my friends after school. In the unlikely event she inquired about anyone smoking, I would have lied. Wasn't throwing my friends under the bus.

Was I guilty of smoking because I washed my clothes?

Had I lied, did that mean I was lighting up, too?

I don't believe Ray Lewis was a complete saint the day of the double stabbing for which he was initially charged (and yes, I'm well aware murder is a lot worse than smoking, thank you). He ditched his bloody suit, which was never recovered, and was initially dishonest with investigators. That's clearly obstruction of justice, for which he plead guilty.

But Lewis never faced a murder trial trial. His charges were dropped. The two friends he ultimately testified against were acquitted.

Will we ever know what precisely went down January 31, 2000? No. But automatically equating obstruction of justice to PHYSICALLY taking a knife and fatally stabbing two people flies in the face of everything our legal system--albeit imperfect-- is supposed to be about. That Ray Lewis payed for his friends' trial lawyers doesn't provide any ironclad evidence of murder. That line of thinking implies anyone who covers someone else's defense costs is somehow entangled in the crime.

That Lewis payed a substantial settlement to the victims' families is another compelling argument for assuming guilt, but again... completely subjective. Perhaps it was guilt of a different kind: knowing those people would never again see their loved ones, and Lewis watched it all go down. How can we possibly know?

With Lewis' pending retirement, all these questions are understandably resurfacing. The conundrum among many of my journalistic brethren: determining how we, personally, feel about Ray Lewis. On one hand, he was unquestionably with the wrong crew at the wrong time that night in Atlanta; on the other, he's had an incredibly positive impact on so many on the field and off it through his tireless charitable endeavors. I don't give a crap about how good of a linebacker he is. That doesn't sway my judgement one iota.

So, as you ponder Ray Lewis' legacy, ask yourself...

Was I guilty of smoking because I washed my clothes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How sure are you he had anything to do with the murders?

As I said, I'm not. I don't know one way or another. The issue for me is that there is always that question. None of us know if he did or didn't have anything to do with those murders. But, from everything I've read over the years and the things I've seen on the incident, he at least didn't cooperate with investigators... Which is understandable. And then there is the fact that he reached a settlement with the victim's families within the last few years (may have been last year IIRC).

We see all the time where members of an athlete's entourage take the fall for a guy and in return he takes care of them/their family for life. I just don't know. But the fact that the suit disappeared and was never found and that he was at least in the area of the crime... I mean, that all points to the fact that he at least was present in the immediate area of the murder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...