Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't Cut DW!


Way Truth Life

Recommended Posts

No GM in football would have given 2 RBs those contacts....yet people still think we need both.

Take away Williams play against the worst D in the history of the NFL.....he was average.

There aren't the touches to justify having this bad joke backfield. We need to look at the future and that extended beyond 2013. Pay talent that can be on the field every down and is a heavy part of what we want to do.

What DeAngelo could do in 2013 in a offense suited for him is largely irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No GM in football would have given 2 RBs those contacts....yet people still think we need both.

Take away Williams play against the worst D in the history of the NFL.....he was average.

There aren't the touches to justify having this bad joke backfield. We need to look at the future and that extended beyond 2013. Pay talent that can be on the field every down and is a heavy part of what we want to do

I don't disagree with you at all.

Having two RB's making that much is just a luxury a team can't really afford.

I just wanted to know how old SuperJ was because of all of his other dumb posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta keep him, Stew will never hold up.

Or draft a good back at a spot of value, you know, 4th round or so.

Yes, lets continue to pay large sums of money to RBs that aren't big pieces in our offense. Hurney Magic Forever!!!!

2009- IR

2010- IR

2011 - became 2nd string essentially despite title

2012- became officially 2nd string

But the again, he looked good against the worst D in league history so lets ignore the rest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No GM in football would have given 2 RBs those contacts....yet people still think we need both.

Take away Williams play against the worst D in the history of the NFL.....he was average.

There aren't the touches to justify having this bad joke backfield. We need to look at the future and that extended beyond 2013. Pay talent that can be on the field every down and is a heavy part of what we want to do.

What DeAngelo could do in 2013 in a offense suited for him is largely irrelevant.

Michael-What-the-office-10400786-400-226.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If i was going to keep one of our RBs it would be williams. Stewart is worth more due to his age and has more physicality to him in a trade scenario. Tolbert can function as a poor man's Jstew also, Deangelo's style cannot be replaced.

Tolbert and Williams were awesome during the last 4 games. The run game/dump off pass came to life and the offense was solid scoring at will. I re-watched the last 4 games on Sunday and the most obvious thing I saw was DW/Tolbert carrying some of Cams rushing load along with a VERY improved special teams. DW needs to be restructured. Letting him walk would be as bad as letting Peppers walk....maybe worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...