Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers propose 10 year tether, 6 year "hard" tether


SCP

Recommended Posts

Look, give the team the money or don't. If a new owner really wants to move the team, they will. A "hard" tether for six years isn't going to stop it.

Yep. This will just determine how much it will cost the owner to move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expand the metro system or give a rich guy a large welfare check in hopes he doesn't take our team away.

Decisions, decisions.

I think Richardson has talked himself into thinking this is good for the community and ties the team here long term after he's gone. It's a "favor" to us. But seriously, if you want to be captain awesome, you could just sell a large stake of the team now to somebody who wants the team to stay here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@CBJspanberg: Deal leaves $11M in conv center reserve fund. Kimble calls it 'slim margin' but says city likely to seek more from state for conv ctr later.

@CBJspanberg: Projects omitted because of smaller deal include club seat/suite improvements, indoor practice field, upgrades to team store.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@CBJspanberg: City would split contributions into three payments to Panthers: 2014, 2016 and 2018.

@CBJspanberg: Panthers deal includes minority, women and small biz provisions. Aggregate goal is 16% for phase 1.

@CBJspanberg: Tether for team is proportional to public capital dollars contributed or $12.5M per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I find myself flipping between the worst case scenario of Bryce either playing just mediocre enough for our decision makers to justify giving him a contract extension in their eyes because they want to justify drafting him. Or Bryce going back to playing poorly and us having no one else to fall back on because Pickett might be decent for one or two games but there's no one else and our locker room starts to get ugly because we went all in with our salary cap and guys careers are on the line. This scenario which IMO is the higher probability given our schedule and the amount of tape out there on Bryce is why I say if we can trade down and acquire a few more mid or late round picks we should draft a developmental QB. Not looking for a guy to be the savior but someone with the necessary physical tools and who could actually run a QB sneak. But we'll just have to see how it shakes out. I just want a competitive team but the last thing I want is the season to fall apart because we once again threw our arms up in regards to the QB room.
    • ^This. Rico was dynamite when we needed it last season, but not enough to keep but it massively upped his earning potential. It was a win-win for both sides. And he was there to cover the hole left by the injury to another RB, and hopefully his release to free agency means there's good news for us on the way. These new ones give us the opportunity to do that again, on the offensive line and elsewhere. We've got some long term question marks here and there due to injuries and age, and these players have a chance to up their value on the open market or settle down with us if the opportunity arises. And none of it ties us down with dead money down the road if it doesn't work out. And we've been in dead money hell for a decade now. Lease the ones you like, buy if you fall in love.
×
×
  • Create New...