Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hold Onto Your Butts: MKG BEING SHOPPED.


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Warriors have Barnes, not seeing that fit.

 

Doubt the Bucks are getting rid of Larry Sanders/Henson/Ilyaslova 

 

Hawks are probably making a run at D12/CP3 and I don't know who they would trade.

 

Celtics, don't see them having the pieces at all.  

 

If the Bucks would let go of Sanders, I would do a trade sending MKG and Jeff Adrien to Milwaukee for Larry Sanders and Ekpe Udoh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only way I'd be cool with it is a Barnes trade. But, really why would Golden State trade away Barnes who showed huge potential last season.

Even if that happens, we'd still be lacking a BIG. I would have to think that it would be a MKG for a center or PF. If we want to stay in rebuild mode in order to get a play in a Wiggins or Parker sweepstake next year this doesn't make sense:

2014 SF: Barnes, Porter, Wiggins/Parker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess maybe a trade where Charlotte sends MKG and Gerald Henderson (sign and trade) to Golden State for Harrison Barnes (Charlotte plays him as a shooting guard) and the BuzzCats draft Otto Porter...

 

 

PG- Kemba Walker

SG- Harrison Barnes

SF- Otto Porter

PF- Bismack Biyombo

C- ?

 

If somehow we pull that off, we might as well sign Al Jefferson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...