Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tuck Rule.


Snake

Recommended Posts

Yeah I knew they'd get it back but I was waiting on the flag. Odd. Announcers didn't say anything about either.

Of course not...They were too wrapped up in the tuck rule...The reality is that he threw a pass backwards if they are going to call it an incomplete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just dont understand how if it was thrown forward it was not grounding and if it was thrown sideways it was not a fumble. I understand that the WR can try to tuck the ball if his arm is moving forward but if there is no WR around its still grounding if your in the box. They really need to take this grey rule out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just dont understand how if it was thrown forward it was not grounding and if it was thrown sideways it was not a fumble. I understand that the WR can try to tuck the ball if his arm is moving forward but if there is no WR around its still grounding if your in the box. They really need to take this grey rule out.

Diggs blocked the ball from what I saw. Once he touched the ball all bets were off as far as intentional grounding goes. It appeared to me that he tried to tuck the ball and take the sack, but did it too late and Diggs knocked the ball out of his hands before he got it fully tucked, which caused the refs to say arm coming forward and the reversal of the call on the field.

If I'm wrong, then you have a point...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diggs blocked the ball from what I saw. Once he touched the ball all bets were off as far as intentional grounding goes. It appeared to me that he tried to tuck the ball and take the sack, but did it too late and Diggs knocked the ball out of his hands before he got it fully tucked, which caused the refs to say arm coming forward and the reversal of the call on the field.

If I'm wrong, then you have a point...

Yea that would make since cause if it his a player then falls to the ground then its incomplete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm salty every time I see someones mid picks become stars while we throw first and second rounders over and over and they all stink outside of Tet (who still has a lot to prove, imo)
    • There is a contingent that is total Bryce but they weathervane with the wind. When the good Bryce wind blows about once or twice a month we hear a lot from them. But they are always pro Bryce, they just don’t pipe up too much when he sucks. I can’t speak for them, as far as what they are looking at.    In a second contingent, the collective mind is made up. He has had had basically three years worth of starts that might include a top tier outing or two, a few second tier outings, offset by about the same number of bottom tier outings which actually may have the edge there.  The rest of his stuff is third tier and that is going to be the bulk of his starts. We want to move on. And we aren’t getting off of that hill until he puts us off of it. He has not.    There is a third contingent that has no conviction and definitely weather vanes. Bryce is good. Bryce isn’t good. Depending on the latest game. They will buy into 7 on 7 success so that should tell you something. 
    • Nacua is really fuging good. He might be a better version of Cooper Kupp.
×
×
  • Create New...