Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#1 seed vs. saints missing the playoffs


#1 seed vs. saints missing playoffs  

208 members have voted

  1. 1. would you rather the panthers be the #1 seed, or the saints miss the playoffs

    • #1 seed
      157
    • no playoffs for the saints
      51


Recommended Posts

Wait, this is a question? Seriously?

Are you a panthers fan, or an anti-saints fan?

I hate to be that guy that questions fanhood on the fan board, but if you'd give up a chance to play for an NFC title at home to see the saints stay home, you deserve to answer those questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why on earth is this even a question? Obviously we want the #1 seed and home field throughout. I can hold a grudge as well as the next guy, but what type of person roots for his enemy to fail over his own good fortune and success?

 

1) Go Panthers. Take care of your business.

 

Distant 2a and 2b - Go Rams and Niners this week.

 

F*ck the Saints. I couldn't care less what they do as long as they don't beat us or end up with the #2 seed (see point 1 above).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, this is a question? Seriously?

Are you a panthers fan, or an anti-saints fan?

I hate to be that guy that questions fanhood on the fan board, but if you'd give up a chance to play for an NFC title at home to see the saints stay home, you deserve to answer those questions.

 

Both

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, this is a question? Seriously?

Are you a panthers fan, or an anti-saints fan?

I hate to be that guy that questions fanhood on the fan board, but if you'd give up a chance to play for an NFC title at home to see the saints stay home, you deserve to answer those questions.

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope you understand that this Anti Bryce thing as you call it is really a pro Panthers thing. I think I can safely use we. We want the best for the Panthers.  As far as this other post saying ‘Anti’ Bryce people do misinformation.. you mean like going all in on “Renfro should have caught” that poorly thrown ball? I guess it was week 1. And calling it a drop. Comical btw.  I wonder, did you call that out or let it slide because it aligned with your agenda? 
    • These are great posts with the comparisons and the numbers.   I haven’t lookyat Smity’s numbers since probably the first time he was on the ballot.  But if you watched every week you know what he is. Whatever his yardage or targets numbers were.  He was fuging dominant. I have watched since the AFL days and seen who there is to see. There are many great WRs over the years. GREAT WRs. Smitty is up there in the game of football. 
    • Smith is clear cut HOF if you judge what he did by reception. Fitzgerald was a stat padder.    The most Steve Smith was ever targeted in his career was in 2005 (150 targets). The same year he wins the triple crown.    Larry Fitzgerald was targeted more than 150 times over 9 separate seasons. Not once eclipsing 1500 yards in a season.    The over glazing of Larry Fitzgerald going around is way over blown. ARZ was top 10 in passing attempts nearly his entire prime. Steve Smith and Andre Johnson had it far worse and would have surpassed his #s in the same situation.
×
×
  • Create New...