Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Cam2Ligit2Quit

Ted Ginn joins the Panthers on a one-year deal

385 posts in this topic

I want a WR so bad that I'll poo on the ones who actually contribute to the team as well.

That's lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like this signing...I originally wanted Cribbs but this will work....Its like one year deal, if you want to eat the next year you better perform btch! hahaaa!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i love the approach.

I imagine its the same with Mitchell, they let the Ginn know " Come here and be a KR/PR, but WR outside of Smith is up for grabs, you want to be one prove it and you may have cemented your future here. " Should help us get some interesting prospect and hopefully light a fire under everyone's asses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't know about adams talent as a receiver, at least demonstrated last year, but i think that heading into the season that AE, pilares, and gettis are all likely gone. at least two of them for sure.

Unless there is some off the field stuff going on. I still think Gettis size, speed, youth and cheapness will give him a shot at the 3rd WR job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't know about adams talent as a receiver, at least demonstrated last year, but i think that heading into the season that AE, pilares, and gettis are all likely gone. at least two of them for sure.

Gettis - Pro's Good Rookie Season showed Promise

Con's Very Injury Prone

AE - Pro's When he has the ball he is an amazing talent in the open field

Con's He doesn't seem to get open enough to get the ball

Pilares - Pro's Hard runner and showed some flash in the KR game

Con's Slow and coming off injury

Adams - Pro's About the same as AE

Con's Fumblitis and was in dog house most of the season. Everyone Cringes when he touched the ball.

If you had to keep two I would Keep Gettis and Pilares

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in those I formations he will but he passing situations I believe they will relieve him of his duties. I definitely don't want Keuchly covering a tight end. The dude is smart but if it's not a double team, it will be the same scenario it has been the past recent years.

What are you talking about? Kuechly took on V-Jax and almost made a game changing play. It just so happened that Freeman made a perfect pass and all Luke could do is tackle Jackson and hope he'd drop the pass.

I think he did a fairly good job covering TEs this last season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. Give me a list of who you will be bringing in to replace them with our non existent salary cap space.

Playing Madden isn't the same as being a real world GM.

Let me guess, App State homer??? Right now we have Adams/Smith/Lafell/Pliares/Ginn/Bryant/Gettis/Edwards at WR, and we seem to be drafting one early this year. We don't need to replace them with ANYONE. We should only be carrying 6-7 into the regular season, which means 2 need to go, aka Armanti and Pilares more then likely. Maybe you're the one playing too much Madden, or just want to be the Jon Gruden of WRs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gettis - Pro's Good Rookie Season showed Promise

Con's Very Injury Prone

AE - Pro's When he has the ball he is an amazing talent in the open field

Con's He doesn't seem to get open enough to get the ball

Pilares - Pro's Hard runner and showed some flash in the KR game

Con's Slow and coming off injury

Adams - Pro's About the same as AE

Con's Fumblitis and was in dog house most of the season. Everyone Cringes when he touched the ball.

If you had to keep two I would Keep Gettis and Pilares

Dis bllsht of keepin dudes around for years that cant help you win is ovah!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gettis - Pro's Good Rookie Season showed Promise

Con's Very Injury Prone

it's been how long since his rookie year? i've lost interest. not sure anyone on the coaching staff has any either. until proven otherwise, one hit wonder.

AE - Pro's When he has the ball he is an amazing talent in the open field

Con's He doesn't seem to get open enough to get the ball

he had amazing talent in the open field in college. haven't seen any of that since he came here. i seriously doubt it will ever be seen.

Pilares - Pro's Hard runner and showed some flash in the KR game

Con's Slow and coming off injury

flash is being a bit generous. haven't seen it. hard runner? i'll give him that. beyond that nothing special.

Adams - Pro's About the same as AE

Con's Fumblitis and was in dog house most of the season. Everyone Cringes when he touched the ball.

rookie. want to see if he can do something next year. if not, move on.

If you had to keep two I would Keep Gettis and Pilares

wouldn't keep either one. i'm just not interested in either one at all. very easily replaced and upgraded.

truth be told, i'm not interested in any of them. at least lafell has shown he can make some tough catches and grew some as a receiver after his rookie year. i doubt he'll ever be anything more than solid. the rest of the guys....meh. it won't be hard to upgrade any of them and aside from curiousity i have in adams as to what he can do with a year under his belt i don't see any reason to hold on to them or try to find upgrades/replacements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined