
ECHornet
HUDDLER-
Posts
1,916 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by ECHornet
-
I enjoyed the commentary but didn’t get to listen to all of it. What’s your beef with talent evaluation of Brady? Seems most they were discussing is technique that needs to be corrected. He looked solid for a 3rd round rookie OL.
-
Agree with the idea that all are unproven. That’s why I said “I believe so.”
-
Restructuring can also use existing cap space to make future cap space better. Robbie could be an example there, right?
-
There would be no talk about a QB that was #1 on many draft boards coming into the year? Doubtful
-
Improving on the players that are currently your starters? Yes, that seems a pretty good place to start.
-
Is he better than Darnold/current Cam? I believe so. So yes, I would like him behind this line.
-
'20 Cam vs. '21 Garoppolo (and '19) (+ a Darnold tidbit)
ECHornet replied to Dory's topic in Carolina Panthers
I’m good with bringing Cam back for cheap as long as he’s content being the short yardage + red zone option only. -
I think it’s obvious we didn’t want to get rid of Shaq or CMC this year.
-
I’m fine with the risk. Throw him out there and if it doesn’t work, you’re likely sitting with a top 5 pick in 2023. Would also be likely to flip Willis for a 2nd/4th/6th a year or two later it he’s not the guy. As we learned the hard way there will be a team desperate enough to take a chance on a 1st round QB still on his rookie contract.
-
Not a prediction of who will end up best, but pure excitement level list for me… 1. Willis 2. Howell 3. Pickett 4. Ridder 5. Strong 6. Corral 7. Zappe 8. Purdy
-
Josh Allen didn’t win a damn thing at Wyoming. If he couldn’t elevate his team in the Mountain West, what good is he right? No, I don’t think Howell is anywhere close to Allen, but at least use a stronger argument.
-
This is a tough decision. IMO, if you don’t have a lengthy contract with a franchise QB, you should never pass an opportunity to select the first QB off the board. Especially if you may be down to the 3rd tackle on your board like some mocks show as a possibility.
-
Compare Trevor Lawrence’s stats to Howell’s and then re-assess why you believe Howell was underwhelming. Unless, of course, you didn’t think Lawrence was the golden child QB prospect in college.
-
Yes, both teams getting an equal opportunity is what he wants.
-
Things couldn’t have set up better for Tepper and Rhule
ECHornet replied to mcsmoak's topic in Carolina Panthers
How would you describe the Bengals OL performance yesterday? Looked a lot like us up front. -
Things couldn’t have set up better for Tepper and Rhule
ECHornet replied to mcsmoak's topic in Carolina Panthers
I can see that argument. I’d counter with one has an already established ceiling in the NFL while the other could be better. -
Things couldn’t have set up better for Tepper and Rhule
ECHornet replied to mcsmoak's topic in Carolina Panthers
They made it to the Super Bowl with that line. You get there and mission has been accomplished from a team building perspective. -
Things couldn’t have set up better for Tepper and Rhule
ECHornet replied to mcsmoak's topic in Carolina Panthers
For those who want Mayfield, why not trade back in the first and go after Howell (if he stays lower first Rd projection)? They are very similar. Drafting Howell = acquiring more picks + cheap contract for years Mayfield = trade away more picks + expensive contract -
I'm fine with that. Just thinking it over, I don't see the downside with signing him five years to provide stability in the QB room with at minimum a solid backup option. He'd be 32 at the end of that contract. Playing a role in my thought process is I still believe he's a mid to bottom third starter in the league, and we can get him here for cheap. Why not?
-
Oh no! Winning more games? The horror
-
It’s 5mil a year for a guy who has proven to be a strong backup QB at minimum. With the expanding cap looming, that’s nothing. Personally, I’d much prefer to lock him up for cheap than deal with PJ/Grier backups.
-
I vote for Trubisky at 5 years/25 mil. $5 mil would put him in top 10 of backup QBs. We would lock up a strong backup who has potential to be a mid tier starter.
-
My two appealing considerations for resigning Gilmore… 1. It sounds like his wife wants to be in Charlotte closer to home and he could be attainable for cheaper than he’s worth. 2. He would be an ideal example for our young CBs to learn from in the secondary.
-
I’m still waiting to see what we do with Gilmore. I’m expecting D Jackson to be a free agent. If we resign Gilmore on a team friendly deal, I would look to move one of our plethora of CBs to FS.
-
Sign James Daniels in free agency. 24 year old guard with experience at center. 5 years/50 mil. This locks up a guard spot with positional flexibility. Then we can try Elf at center and see if it works through the first third of the 22 season. Im currently undecided between targeting a QB or T in the 1st. Right now I would love to trade back and pick Cross somewhere in the 10-15 range and acquire some day 2 picks. I would be hopeful with a line of Cross-Christensen-Elf-Daniels-Moton QB in 23 and try to sign Trubisky to compete with Darnold in 22 (aka start over Darnold).