Mr. Scot

Valid. I do think the main person who has to answer for what happened last night has gotta be Reid.

I'm a fan. Still remember the game where he had to be carried to the huddle between plays.

Crossed my mind too. I mean, we all saw what was happening out there. How do you not try something?

Lotta folks on Twitter pointing out that in last night's game, Eric Bieniemy didn't exactly show anybody they made a huge mistake not hiring him as a head coach. Todd Bowles, on the other hand... (and Byron Leftwich)

Let's leave them on an island. I'd have expected some Max Protect in there. Fewer receiving options, but when you have a quarterback like Mahomes, it can still work. Would have made sense to adjust to that (or something) once they saw what was happening last night, but apparently not. Andy Reid is universally considered an offensive genius, but he's been known to make some positively inexplicable decisions in the playoffs from time to time. I'd have to say this is one of them.

I'd be happy with Watson, but I think what we'd have to give up to acquire him would basically turn us into the same team he's trying to get away from. Don't believe the Texans are going to trade him anyway, though.

In Carolina, we haven't needed injuries. We've just started with a bad offensive line from the get-go.

...in just a word or two, what?

See, like this guy that Alaina Getzenberg is quoting here...He gets it..

No idea. It'd certainly make a lot of sense this offseason because then we'd only be looking for a right tackle.

You do also have to take into consideration that as the season went on, opponents got more tape on our schemes.

Just hanging on to Moton isn't enough. Realistically, we need a couple of upgrades, but at the very least we really need a left tackle who can both play well and play every game.

I meant Marty had multiple ways to screw us. Either way, if anyone who watched that game tonight still thinks we can get by with half-assing an offensive line, they need to seriously rethink themselves.

I wish I could say there was only one of those.

It's a valid point.

Edward Woodward was phenomenal. He didn't have to be physically imposing for you to be afraid of him.

Not throwing money at guys coming off major injuries in the hope that maybe they're healthy would probably be a good step on our part too.

I don't buy into the NFL being rigged, but that was as poorly officiated a game as I've seen in a while.

To be fair, the original was an out of shape British guy in his 60s. Always liked that show though. Threats sound way cooler when they're delivered with an English accent.

Wouldn't bet on that. Sports talk, whether it's online, on radio or on TV is likely to be talking about how that game was officiated for a while. It doesn't mean the Chiefs didn't deserve to lose, but any criticism the NFL gets for how crappy a job those refs did is justified.

There's a difference between blaming the refs and saying the refs were bad. Poor officiating may have contributed, but there were many other factors which can be blamed on the Chiefs themselves. With that said, the officiating in this game was horse sh-t, and that would have been true no matter who won the game.

You generally do see the starting quarterback included in things like this, but as mentioned in the other discussion, last year's promos didn't include Cam either.

Last year's season promos didn't include Newton either.

Terry McAulay was criticizing the calls on his Twitter. Others like Boomer, Chris Simms and many more had a thing or two to say as well.

When you've got commentators and even former officials willing to call out the refs, it's a bad look.