kungfoodude

Pretty obvious. He doesn't like Cam. There is no other argument to be made for anyone in our history over prime Cam. Not even my favorite players, like Smitty and Peppers. We have never had a player that can and did dominate games like Cam at his peak.

Robinson indicates it's a source from a team that was involved at some point, so that actually makes sense. I don't think Watson's camp cares much about leaking trade information at this point. They have their hands full with the off the field stuff.

Yeah, I think that is just about maybe getting something for basically nothing(Perryman, Little) or the ability to bring in a guy like Santoso in a pinch. Rhule was pretty ruthless last year with cutting people too.

Give me Gross, Kalil AND Cam then watch the fuging #1 offense in the NFL.

Doesn't sound like the Texans are coming off the price, so even with conditional picks as part of the deal, I don't think I would pull the trigger at the price they want. Three 1st round picks and two 2nd round picks would severely hamper our rebuilding efforts.

It's very interesting that it is a team that is no longer in the running that is spilling the beans. I am pretty amazed the Texans haven't come off their initial price, if those reports are accurate.

I think that message has been pretty clear from early on in his tenure.

I'd be surprised if the rumor wasn't coming from the Texans.

Slow your roll a little. Remember these are some young, young, young, young guys out there. It's gonna take some polish for them to be that kind of defense, even if they did have Luke.

I think it would have to be more than a few, unfortunately. The bones are there, but there might be leaks in the roof and the foundation is cracked to hell. I'll be glad to be proven wrong but we need the OL and QB situation to really turn out well for us to see anything close to top 5.

He actually made a big improvement from year one of place kicking to year two. 81% FG's, 100% on XP's. I think Minnesota decided to move on because they had lost their punter and had another really good kicker on the roster(was a Groza award semi-finalist in his first season starting).

I thought he was Luigi.

It's a long snapper, man. Long snappers don't put points on the board directly. If Fletcher becomes a 15+ year career long snapper.....we can find another one of those in the next couple of years in the UDFA pool.

Group Two: Luke and Ryan Kalil Any combination of those four guys immediately make our team dramatically better.

Easiest answer ever. Jordan Gross and Cam Newton. Those guys probably make this offense top 5 in the NFL.

We won't know if we fuged up for a few years, most likely. If the Bears are smart, they will let Fields ride the pine and let Dalton take all the shots while Nagy rides him into unemployment. Scott is just doing the "pretending to not have an opinion but clearly having an opinion" thing. It's fine. He's been staunchly anti-Watson after the allegations started to come to light. I get it.

I believe he has only had 1 or 2 bad snaps in his career. IIRC his last one was almost a decade ago.

Well, he's never missed a FG in an NFL regular season game.

I think the first scenario is rather unlikely but we will see. I am not sure about the draft option. They have had two opportunities to draft a QB and opted for a veteran. It will be interesting to see what we decide to do.

I think later is probably 2022 and that is assuming Watson's legal troubles are resolved by then. Unless something really dramatic happens with his legal cases(like they all disappear suddenly), he's gonna be on the shelf for a while.

I don't think people realize that the long snapper position basically got a reprieve because of progressive rule changes. If you have a good long snapper, there is no reason to get another long snapper unless your guy gets injured or retires. Turns out....we actually have one of the best long snappers in the NFL. Yet we want to jettison him for a guy that keeps making bad snaps in camp and preseason games.