Jump to content

Waldo

All-PRO
  • Posts

    9,798
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Waldo

  1. It is absolutely the best option but requires someone else to value one in the massive pack of teir 2 players. We need to find a Hurney chasing 'his guy'.
  2. Trade back. There is no one at 8 that is much better than in the teens. So much meh. Getting a 2nd, early or mid, seems like the same quality of players with less hype so go double dip with 2 for thr price of 1 by trading back if possible.
  3. Maybe instead of the Jets or Browns aim for a team that isn't a perpetual failure too? These connections stink. Maybe check out what well run franchises are up to and not the HC who is still employed because Watson and his trade were a gaint barrier to any decent hire? Canales wants to do what the guy with 3 wins last year is interested in. Yikes
  4. Get an extra 2nd and let them give a better pick in 2026 if it's not a mid 3rd. Teams devalue future picks too much IMO. The trade up looks aweful. The trade back looks sexy.
  5. When you can't do something good then do something familiar. -Anyone over the heads trying to keep up
  6. I Was told you can't draft OGs in the 2nd or 3rd and expect them to be day 1 starters last year. Huh that's weird isn't it?
  7. Wow how did i get that so wrong. 23 not 25 in his draft. Just dumb and still needs ro learn to be a WR. Completely agree about the rest.
  8. I like it. Picking needs and strengths of the draft. Sounds great!
  9. It would be like passing up on a RB in this draft. Too deep to not spend a pick on both IMO.
  10. Brooks was a bad pick. Chubba didn't matter because it was known Brooks would miss a lot of time well ahead of the draft plus the GM signed Sanders as an AGM and pro personnel guy. It was just a bad pick and this draft is loaded with guys who can make Brooks meaningless if he ever is actually healthy. Just a bad pick and BS from every angle to justify it. XL is 26 and trying to work on being a decent WR. That's not great but it just shows that these people can do anything and think it's great at the time.
  11. We spent a 2nd last year on a RB that won't take meaningful snaps in 2 years now along with a WR that body catches while trading up 1 spot into the 1st so they could get a 5th year option on a 25 year old project. Don't underestimate the "experts" ability to do dumb things and think it's great.
  12. He is a numbers guy. Been around some good things but I haven't seen any clues that he knows anything about the tallent or how to peice it together. Fritters was around talented people and nothing of value rubbed off on him and he came up a scout lol. Dan better do better or that seat should start heating up.
  13. Sure but still draft one later and watch that guy beat him out of the 90 man roster. We are only safe from Thomas until the Raiders realize he can't block for poo either.
  14. BPA is an oversimplification in fans minds. For teams it's everything that went into making their boards, which is a lot (some facts and some intangibles like feeling). Teams take entire positions off the board for rounds or entire drafts. You sure didn't see us take a flyer on a late round QB last year for reasons. If teams even knew who really was BPA then they wouldn't flop so hard on so many picks. BPA is a cop out for fans to hope the people in charge do well and people on teams saying their opinions are correct. It often does not.
  15. I'm not high on most of the moves but it does not look worse than last year. The odds make us easy targets for this crap. It's the new normal until they prove otherwise.
  16. Wasn't he accused in HS and came into Virgina on probation which he failed out of in 1 year?
  17. Hard to care about tallent when his availability is in question. How long until he becomes an NFL offender? Seems like a bad bet if the team is looking for talent to build upon. Would this even be a question if the draft wasn't lacking in teir 1 guys? I don't think so.
  18. The only NT on the roster is a 2 down guy known for getting gassed. I still hope they draft one too.
  19. A Good but not available enough CB, a backup in round 3 where you hope to hit on starter and a good RB exactly where good RBs are found. I can't go better than meh. The rest was that bad. Doing worse than that should get people fired quick. That's what I hope an off year looks like if we ever get a great crew.
  20. Crews have a long history of leaning on guys they shouldn't but still do. Bersin, that crappy Hback that Ron loved, DG with his Chandler or Ian Thomas through multiple people inexplicably. It's a thing. On a good team Scott wouldn't make the team over an UDFA but we will see. Still don't respect running to that quality given the situation.
  21. Or he is one of the reasons we were the worst in the league? It's not the 70s so why not churn the roster in that horrific of a situation? When said player is 29 and absolutely what he is professionally. He played in 10 games and started 4. That is garbage outside of a 90 man roster. Jones was a gunner so he was an ace before the changes, not a good one but Ron had many weaknesses. He was also a disaster when they fugged up and had to play him. I didn't really think he was worth it vs a great returner but we also had ST droughts when he was around and took Ron to get fired to jettison that dead weight. I'm not making excuses for that lot. Most of the guys Evero brought in looked bad. Jewell, Sly, this guy whatever. Brown was one player and a hit when he went down but that shouldn't have exposed how bad the rest were to thay degree. Even by 90 man standards they could do better.
  22. I actually looked at both of those from a Google search. Weird that a starters injury history is that hard to find.
  23. All the dead wood bother me regardless on a team after this many losing seasons. He is 29 and his best days are behind him making great money even as a special teams guy. There is not 1 player in this leuge making poverty wages so I only give a crap about the overpaid and the ones in the way of improvement. The rest just falls into good for them to me. Dude was a part of a historically bad D and is taking a spot at a position where they desperately need people to step up. I'll give Richardson the 'I hope he improves this year' but I just hope Scott gets beat out by a rookie or another 90 man roster signing. He is just another Ian Thomas IMO and it's a bad sign him and Sly were brought back in more than a 90 man roster capacity.
×
×
  • Create New...