Waldo

They used to play well agaisnt bad teams but they have purged too much talent to keep thr HC's guys IMO. I think they show up half alive and just blame it on the injury. We have 2 good CBs but they get zero help from behind. It really doesn't take much more than 3 decent options but yeah it would be easier with Hill. Meanwhile double Tet and play the run is all it takes to shut us down. This and the Jets game will determine if we are picking top 10 or top 5 IMO.

Everyone deals with injuries in the NFL. Thier biggest challenge will be coming off a Monday night game. I could see them showing up like Atlanta did.

We get it. It's only on Bryce when it goes well. So which NFL QB wouldn't everyone take over Bryce at this point? Which staff would help him with alm we know? There is no one that runs the scheme Bryce requires to function well because those are all in school. There is no one that can overcome his limitations in that scheme regularly in the NFL. But it's never on Bryce... I am so tired of having a QB that has to be carried constantly or play a team that's asleep.

I find it funny that these guys sign up for this job after multiple meeting with Tepper. Coaches or GMs who 'didn't interview well' or decline further interviews show a lot of intelligence IMO. Tepper has a type and it's why the team is a constant dumpster fire.

They overspent on OGs so they went cheap behind them. Classic overreach. Brining back an injury prone C just leads to the eventual shorthanded they set up through their personnel choices. With Moton making bank too they were left hoping to avoid injuries...a very dumb approach in the NFL.

That's the cycle. The field is stagnant until someone figured out the next thing to move the pile. A huge chunk of old school baseball was such fluff. The ugly girlfriend in moneyeball comes to mind. Thay entire scout scene was hilarious from the 'expertise' they slang.

I just don't want PFF's analytics guys tho. Give me number crunches and not guys selling their angles. Hard pass on that. I would rather take analysis from non financially biased people.

There are so few official stats in football. The rest are subjective and debatable, it'snever going to be baseball because there are too many moving parts every play. PFF makes money off selling the certainty that their stuff is trustable and usable. First betting or fantasy and now they are targeting teams. You don't bring that in house unless you are a sucker or lost objectivity IMO.

Everything I have seem with them is about hiding subjective interpretation behind layers of stats to hide what they really are based on. If it was just stats then we could all do what they do based off of box scores stats and such. That's their magic in their equation, subjective input delivered as fact.

I have no problem with number crunches or being a part of the process but I do with brining in PFF people and running their gospel. Like you said, for a flawed system they pretend it's never them. Well BS. And Tepper is absolutely on their crotch because we just drafted by them while building another easy picking top 10 team again.

They need to fire the PFFtards they hired along with the other staff in the offseason. I think real football people could look over their made up numbers online and figure out whats useful and what is just their opinions. I watched enough of the game this week to not care about PFF and their BS.

I can't belive it took an injury to get Moore out of rotation. Him ans Scott shouldn't have made any roster in the NFL.

Make him finish year 2 but I have seen nothing to justify a year 3. On to the next mistake I guess

Yup. He was never worth half of what he is being paid and a rookie looks to be an improvement even with a learning curve.

Meh keep DC for the year. I don't care about his contract, 2 years of poor performance is enough by NFL standards. I would say fire Evero but Im not sure his staff has anyone to promote. We have all see their work at every level on that D. I would be happy with sitting guys like Scott and letting anyone else play. Play the rookie edge guys. Hell play Ransom because Moehrig can't cover a flat ball. Or just play Moehrig as an ILBer. I just don't give AF at this point.

Practice is most weeks high point. None of these people knows what it takes to be a winner or stay a winner. A cheerleader for a HC makes such a soft team

I'm seeing too many defensive HCs with young QBs that have stalled after initial success. Hire an offensive HC while getting a playcalling OC and buy the best DC they can. A red flag is offensive guy 'taking their hands off the D to focus on the offense'. That's the OCs job so go be a HC and focus on the team.

I wonder what historically bad crews look like in comparison.

There is no fixing not good enough. He peaked in school and there were plenty of us yelling about it before the pick and shortly after. He isn't even good enough to be carried consistently. Just own it because it was always the truth.

It's both. It's all bad. Or mostly beyond a few players.

Seems like adding more fuel to a dumpster fire. I would rather see someone else personally. The Panthers can't handle PR well currently and that's a bad mix with Sanders. Then again let it burn I guess.

At least we could laugh at whoever took them

The Backshot Crew would be appropriate

Thr talent levels include GMs and HCs. One college salesman, a retired HC collecting free money and an OC that needed a lot more time to build up his skills. A GM who was well liked but did squat that was meaningful with his previous team and a GM that was the last guys right hand while also being likeable but also underqualified. It's systematic with Tepper.

When they said Dawgs they ment weenies.