ForJimmy

I can't quite figure them out. They should be good, but they always seem hot/cold. I mean they had to rally like crazy to beat our team last year....

motherfuger? I think you are thinking of Zach Wilson....

Every time I read "Baker with the 2s" my eye twitches....

Man if Robbie can keep his head in the game our offense could be solid.

Now we are negotiating!!

A Canadian would never part with their maple syrup. These rumors have to be fake. Has Garry Cobb confirmed it yet?

It's the "Nard Dawg' avatar that really completes it.

I've always imagined you posting with a seductive tone....

I would hope so. Only two payers are running routes, everyone else is blocking with 7 defenders staying back in coverage.

We really need Tremble or Thomas to start building some chemistry with Baker. With Rhule wanting to run the ball a lot (Icky is going to crush some people in run blocking BTW), our TEs should see more opportunities.

He is playing as good as most QBs do early in TC. Especially those on new teams/offenses. I remember Cam throwing INTs/fighting Norman. That’s just part of learning new plays/timing. He has shown he can help a bad franchise get into the playoffs. They however has a better coach and probably roster than we currently do.

Read his posts and look no further. Troll account crying about how good Sam is and calling people “sheep.”

Why is @SammyFranchisestill an account? It’s as clear as day it’s a pure troll account…

He eats bull rushes for breakfast with a side of pancakes.

Garry COBB! Show some respect man!

Matt Corral/Chuck Norris Thread. Matt Corral always comes first....

Lol right? It’s under the huge assumption that BC is a solid LT (skeptical) and Icky because a great LT (hopeful). If we somehow had 2 then trade the older one with less potential for a nice return.

If he isn’t then Icky should be LT sooner vs later.

Yeah not sure how that conclusion was drawn….

*This is all assuming BC is solid was a very important line in my post. If he is and Icky needs some more time LG for Icky starting off is ok. He is our future at the position with a massive (pun intended ceiling). If starting him at LG is the quickest way for him to see the field then I understand the thought process.

Icky’s ceiling is through the roof and his floor (as already stated) is a great LG. Cross is a LT or burst, and the Alabama LT has some injury flags. Icky was the best option IMO. We just happen to have a player in BC who might be a solid LT, but not LG and we can use him until Icky is ready to made the jump then trade him for a nice return. This is all assuming BC is solid. He might look good in TC and struggle to where Icky will make the switch sooner.

@MHS831 already had a good solution. If BC is looking great at LT then start letting Icky get reps at LG for now. BC at LT and Icky at LG is a solid left side if BC is playing so well. We can slide Icky over to LT as he gets better and possibly trade BC next season if he proves to be a solid LT.

You’d be surprised. I mean they are writing “watching film” into contracts. Willie Colon was saying there are 3 types of players. Ones that are above average athletically, but just their ass everyday trying to get an advantage. Ones that have peak athletic ability AND do the work. The third are a group that think their God given talent will take care of them and they don’t need to do much outside of mandatory meetings/practice.

Didn’t even catch that. Thanks!