Jump to content

ForJimmy

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    20,509

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ForJimmy

  1. ForJimmy
    Does it not rollover to next year if we don’t use it?
  2. ForJimmy
    Stinking is an upgrade from Plummer.
  3. ForJimmy
    How? We got two years out of him now he is off the books and we got picks in return for him vs walking away for nothing next year? We have younger talent behind him in Coker.
  4. ForJimmy
    I highly doubt he plays Week 1. Week 2 would be a welcomed surprise honestly. Don't some of these surgeries have weight lifting limitations? A 300 plus pound DE coming full speed is probably a big negative...
  5. ForJimmy
    Why the hate?
  6. ForJimmy
    The best edge is at Auburn thank you very much.
  7. ForJimmy
    I'd be lying if I said I followed SC that closely. I take it there defense is bad this year?
  8. ForJimmy
    Agreed, but he should have this year to show some nice progression. If so and he is coachable man he has a high ceiling....
  9. ForJimmy
    Hooker is a big upgrade from Plummer.
  10. ForJimmy
    as long as Thornton is good....
  11. ForJimmy
    Another Gamecock.
  12. ForJimmy
    These guys aren’t on rosters now for a reason. NFL GMs aren’t dumb they know if a player is a scheme issue or not. Half of these guys signed on other teams just to be cut.
  13. ForJimmy
    He will still be a focus on our offense. We invested a top 10 pick in him so he will get looks and plenty of opportunities.
  14. ForJimmy
    Agreed but it makes some sense. TMac is going to be a focus on the offense, XL should be freed up in the Z, and Coker is young and promising. They all need reps
  15. ForJimmy
    Person (so take it with a grain of salt) claimed AT was already being phased out of the offense based on camp.
  16. ForJimmy
    What was DK traded for?
  17. ForJimmy
    I know, these players had such great careers before coming here.
  18. ForJimmy
    The Sanders thing is fake. We could use some safety help no doubt but the FB thing about him asking us to sign him is fake.
  19. ForJimmy
    Love Moose, but looking back at his career he broke 1000 receiving yards 3/14 times including one insane year in 2004 where he had 16 TDs. Those other 11 years were decent, but the fact he is one of our top WRs in franchise history shows how we really struggle at drafting/developing them.
  20. ForJimmy
    Chris Paul Jr is worth a look.
  21. ForJimmy
    He looked decent filling in during that Kansas City game. Regardless WRs this deep on the roster are special teams players primarily.
  22. ForJimmy
    So you are trying to make people ignore you? Sounds like trolling...
  23. ForJimmy
    There is a 100% correlation between fans overreacting to Renfrow not being WR 6/7 on our depth chart and Clemson fans.
  24. ForJimmy
    I get Renfrow is easy to like but he is a year removed from the league in which he had some pretty pedestrian stats his last two active seasons. Throw in the fact he is already having some injury issues holding him back I can understand why he was released.
  25. ForJimmy
    You are talking about WR 5-6 behind TMac, XL, AT, and Coker. Yes familiarity it something all coaches do. They bring on players they liked from the other teams they coached at. These players know the system with limited reps. Moore is a NFL special teams player who can fill in and play some outside WR. That's what you are at these deep WR positions.
×
×
  • Create New...