Jump to content

ForJimmy

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    19,827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ForJimmy

  1. That's crazy impressive if it's for the season. I feel like it post benching which is still impressive. Those first couple games can really swing things. I'm eager to see how the offense looks this season in year 2 of DC's offense, same OL, and a new weapon in TMac.
  2. Is this for the whole season or just after his benching?
  3. I get being concerned. He is the biggest (pun intended) piece of our defense. We are in trouble if there are any hiccups in his recovery.
  4. He had Olsen then we drafted Funchess and Benjamin in rounds 1 and 2 in consecutive years. Interior OL of Turner, Kalil, and Norwell was pretty great. Stewart was a solid RB, and honestly we tried with Matt Kalil and drafted Greg Little in the 2nd. We seemed to try but definitely failed to build around him. Benjamin mentally checked out, Funchess busted, Matt Kalil struggled, Greg Little busted. We did get lucky with Norwell and Oher was decent until he had concussion issues.
  5. We need depth in our secondary. He is also good at special teams.
  6. Good to know. Thanks!
  7. He is one of the top selling rookie jerseys so it would kind of suck for those fans that have already ordered them.
  8. I think he is 4. At least his jerseys are selling with that number on them right now.
  9. I mean we have Horn as CB1 with a lot of cap space allocated to him. Jackson seems fine as CB2 and Chau looked good at NB. We 100% need some depth and a FS but nothing like the OL/DL overhaul they did these past 2 years. Moehrig and Horn are the their expensive secondary pieces going forward.
  10. FS, ILB depth, and CB depth should all be looked at
  11. Yeah I agree. One of the plans worked out. I do like the Seahawks GM responding that Milroe wasn't his QB1. A reporter asked if the reports were true that Milroe was QB1 on his board. He closed his eyes in thought and was like no we wasn't, but tried to save it a little by saying he was "close." Must have gotten him when he was overtired and let out some truth.
  12. Might be a good thing to pin?
  13. Ah yes, that Gamecock defense was elite...
  14. Both teams seem to know WR talent. How can you say we should have accepted the trade when we don't know what was offered? The Niners weren't far behind us, I doubt they threw in a future premium pick.
  15. Two of the better talent evaluating teams in the league wanted him. Sounds good to me!
  16. He has the arm talent you want with good size and mechanics (can break down under pressure). I feel like PSU never really turned him loose, but they also didn’t hard any great weapons not named Warren. I could see him as a Herbert type prospect who makes a better pro when he gets away from his college’s scheme. I doubt he makes it out of round 1 unless he regresses big time without Warren.
  17. You realize the irony of posting this on a message board in 2025? Anyway I didn't mean anything personal about it. Just how it highlights the post for "popular post" it would be funny to have an "unpopular" one as well. Regardless you got a topic going with lots of responses. In relation to the topic. I was kind of wanting a Leonard or some sort of project QB who can at minimum take over for Dalton for cheap after next year myself. We did sign one that was undrafted but I'm sure that's just an arm for rookie camp...
  18. Another acceptable answer is TMac doesn't drop passes....
  19. I think if you get 10 plus poo reactions it should put a border around your post and label it "unpopular post."
  20. Yeah the fact that they got the next year’s top pick pretty much sealed it as them winning it. We could have picked Stroud and they could have picked Daniels all the same.
  21. Right now I think Wharton, BB, and DB are our starting DL. I also think Jewell and Wallace start at ILB unless we sign someone.
  22. Who you liking in 26’s class? Nico hurt himself, Manning is a question mark, LaNorris looks legit…
×
×
  • Create New...