Jump to content

ForJimmy

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    19,829
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ForJimmy

  1. Aren’t these Teddy attributes? We need someone with arm strength that can stretch the field also. Keeps the defense honest and helps CMC see less players in the box.
  2. More than likely for worse. I’d be ok with this if we have a Lance or Fields behind him.
  3. I guess that (while nothing that big of a deal) was on camera. The Watson thing is just accusations right now with no presented evidence. Once the NFL or courts make some sort of decision on this, then the sponsors may have an easier time terminating the contracts.
  4. It’s a bad look for any team that trades for him right now. It’s not going to be cleared up by the draft so if someone trades for him they are ok with all of these accusations. It could also have a very bad locker room effect on the team he goes to.
  5. I’d honestly prefer Fields or Lance over Wilson. I think they have more potential, no injury concerns, and NFL bodies.
  6. Oh yeah the line should still be addressed, especially with Tua’s injury history. LT just wouldn’t be as important as it usually is. Still prefer Fields and Lance, but I don’t think this is a terrible option. Should also cost us less draft capital to acquire him if Miami pursues another option.
  7. Let’s not derail this topic with Watson crap. The Tinderbox is where that belongs. This thread is about Sam Donaldson.... wait?
  8. Our line graded out average and Davis was one of the better RBs at making something out of nothing. He had the best in the business in CMC for several games then got Davis who was one of the top backs and getting yards after contact. DJ, Anderson, and Samuel were one of the better 3 set WRs. Two of the got over 1000 yards and Samuel just got paid after his year. Our offense needed a TE and could have used an upgrade at LT (wasn’t bad when Okung played) but comparing them to the Jets..... not even close. I want Fields or Lance even if it involves a trade up. I wouldn’t complain if we got Tua some how. Staying put with Teddy is probably my least favorite option. I could maybe get on board if we overhaul our line. However buying low on Darnold, trading Teddy, and getting a Mond, Mills, or Newman in the later rounds would be another option. Not ideal, but we would save money (assuming we trade Teddy). Darnold can start with Mills, Mond, or Newman developing behind him. If he does terrible and we aren’t convinced by whoever we draft we try to get our guy in the next draft. I’m just saying it’s another option that just trying again with the same guy who couldn’t get a game winning drive in like 8 attempts last year after being in the league like 5 years.
  9. I don’t think it affects the line and receivers that much. Vick was lefty and so was Steve Young. The Eagles players looked better than ever Vick’s first year and the Niners didn’t miss a beat when Young became their starter. These guys are the best of the best a minor tweak like that won’t hurt then too much. Plus Tua is young and would be leaning our system. It would take a year or two for the offense to hit its stride regardless more than likely.
  10. It’s hard to compare then fairly since Darnold had no help whatsoever in NY. I mean no line, no weapons, and no running game. I’m not crazy about him, but I believe he has more potential than Teddy.
  11. Just checking in to see if we signed anyone for our secondary...
  12. It depends on what we give up for him. The 8th pick would be off the table IMO.
  13. I’d take him out to a nice dinner AND call him the next day.
  14. Tua would be great. Also he is a lefty so Moton would be protecting his blind side which is perfect.
  15. We don’t have the line/system for him to succeed
  16. The Niners would actually be a good spot for Mac Jones. He can step in right away when Jimmy gets hurt. They have a good offensive line/running game and a solid defense. He can get the ball out quick and make smart reads.
  17. What are your thought on a Davis Mills or Jamie Newman as a project in the mid rounds for plan Y & Z?
  18. Makes sense. Thanks as always for your input!
  19. I’m assuming it’s Jags-Lawrence, Jets- Wilson, and then we try to trade with Miami for Fields at 3. If the Jets take Sewell at 2 then we can look at trading with the Bengals at 5 for Fields/Lance.
  20. You think Atlanta is wanting a QB? If I were them I would wait a few more years, but shouldn’t they just stay at 4 and take Lance or Fields?
  21. Honestly, I’d rather draft Franks than Trask. He has a better arm.
  22. https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2340678-power-ranking-the-10-greatest-college-football-qbs-of-all-time.amp.html This is why you can go strictly on college QB stats. A couple good QBs in the top 25 college QB list. You have to look at his they can play at the next level with better competition. It’s why Mac Jones won’t go number 1 overall to the Jags.
  23. Yeah I just don’t see how you can possible get/think 12 women are willing to play along/lie/sacrifice their career and reputation just to get some money from Watson. I mean these women obviously work with NFL players, so they probably aren’t really hurting for cash. I don’t get why any team is still interested in him at this point.
×
×
  • Create New...