mrcompletely11

too many people with sources

Pickett is better then a back up but he just doesnt have the "it" factor do make a deep run. He will win a lot of games but never will be able to put the team on his back when he has to Willis is a huge gamble and needs the proper infrastructure to develop, something we dont have and even if he did the things he has to improve on may be just too much to overcome Corral, I just dont see what he does very well. He has a quick release and can throw on the move but other than that I just dont see it. Plus the attitude question marks would make me think twice at picking him at 6.

Who is writing him off?

He's missed on a lot of throws. Deep balls and goaline

Tough to say. His deep ball is way off

Lesser of the 3 for sure

This is unwatchable

Wtf are they doing with the cameras?

keep reading: The perceived issues in Willis’ game could take a minute to clean up. His accuracy is tops on that list, as Willis himself noted at the combine. His completion percentage dipped to 61.1 last season and he threw 12 picks. “(I’m) trying to be as consistent as I can with my base,” Willis said. “That’s where some of the flaws in my game come from, maybe some of the inaccuracies.” Whether that’s a fixable issue at the next level depends on whom you ask. Some NFL coaches and scouts will tell you that Willis’ game can be cleaned up — again, draft-and-develop — and that better technique will dial in his throws. From others, you’ll hear that quarterbacks who have accuracy issues in college tend to be permanent concerns. Are there exceptions? Sure. Look at Josh Allen. In general, though, folks on this side of the fence will note how challenging it is to craft a pinpoint passer. WHY HE COULD FALL His accuracy is a work in progress, and he’ll need to learn to take fewer sacks. He’ll see a big jump in offensive complexity and competition going from Liberty to the NFL. The perceived issues in Willis’ game could take a minute to clean up. His accuracy is tops on that list, as Willis himself noted at the combine. His completion percentage dipped to 61.1 last season and he threw 12 picks. “(I’m) trying to be as consistent as I can with my base,” Willis said. “That’s where some of the flaws in my game come from, maybe some of the inaccuracies.” Whether that’s a fixable issue at the next level depends on whom you ask. Some NFL coaches and scouts will tell you that Willis’ game can be cleaned up — again, draft-and-develop — and that better technique will dial in his throws. From others, you’ll hear that quarterbacks who have accuracy issues in college tend to be permanent concerns. Are there exceptions? Sure. Look at Josh Allen. In general, though, folks on this side of the fence will note how challenging it is to craft a pinpoint passer.

coming up

Accuracy is a huge issue with him. What are you talking about? He is a one read, take off running type qb that takes way too many sacks. Physically he is talented but damn that doesnt deserve a top 10 pick imo. Way too much work to do.

He is probably just a major PITA and headcase behind the scenes

no

Pure pocket passers are still winning in the playoffs and still winning super bowls

You're not wrong, I just think the value of a "running qb" is extremely overrated.

Last 5 years playoff qbs on final 4 teams: 2017: Brady, Foles, Bortles, Cousins 2018: Brady, Mahoomes, Goff, Brees 2019: Rodgers, Jimmy G, Mahoomes, Ryan T 2020: Allen, Mahoomes, Brady, Rodgers 2021: Jimmy G, Burrow, Mahoomes, Stafford I count one "running" qb out of 20 potential spots. I think running qbs are just shining toys but when the rubber meets the road in the playoffs defenses can scheme for them and shear arm talent and accuracy win the day.

6'3 225lbs 4.4 40 Rocket arm Great stats vs top of the p5 teams I just dont get the appeal of drafting willis when we past on Fields last year. I think you guys are just chasing your tail here. Add to the fact that he is universally slated to be on the bench for a season at the very least. I just dont see Rhule going this route

Cool story

Slater for me but I would have been content with Fields. Still think he is going to be really really good

This is where I keep coming back to. Why pass on fields last year?

Good stuff from the athletic in regards to det " The perceived issues in Willis’ game could take a minute to clean up. His accuracy is tops on that list, as Willis himself noted at the combine. His completion percentage dipped to 61.1 last season and he threw 12 picks. “(I’m) trying to be as consistent as I can with my base,” Willis said. “That’s where some of the flaws in my game come from, maybe some of the inaccuracies.” Whether that’s a fixable issue at the next level depends on whom you ask. Some NFL coaches and scouts will tell you that Willis’ game can be cleaned up — again, draft-and-develop — and that better technique will dial in his throws. From others, you’ll hear that quarterbacks who have accuracy issues in college tend to be permanent concerns. Are there exceptions? Sure. Look at Josh Allen. In general, though, folks on this side of the fence will note how challenging it is to craft a pinpoint passer. The Lions’ approach everywhere else would suggest they’d argue for the former, more patient route. Brunell, for what it’s worth, was a 52 percent career passer in college and at 59.5 percent as a three-time All-Pro in the NFL. He also was a fifth-round pick. The last thing the Lions want to do is talk themselves into the idea of a quarterback at No. 2." https://theathletic.com/3202872/2022/03/22/is-malik-willis-becoming-a-draft-reality-for-the-lions-why-it-makes-sense-and-why-it-doesnt/

In your opinion, how do the steelers move to 2 from 20? I aint seeing it.

say what now?

Darnold has the mental fortitude of a teletubby

Yep, and if Willis goes 3 somebody is getting pushed down to us. And if by some crazy scenario a team trades in front of us we may have our choice of 2 of the top 3