MHS831

I am seeing Wilson, Sewell there too, but when the dust settles...probably right.

I knew he had 1. Jeez. 31 years old. Still, when I talk about Brady's "type" I guess I am referring to his systems "type." But I was not counting on him leaving.

Read my posts---not sure you are responding to what I am saying

Not sure I follow, but "no'?

I am REALLY looking forward to breaking these QBs down.

Id add Jones too. I really see Brady liking him in this system--not to say he will not like Wilson et al better, but...

Watching tape, but not really for results. Footwork, release, reads, pocket presence, throwing on the run, the route tree, etc. I do not know the answer because I have not looked and in some areas of QB assessment, I have no idea what I am seeing vs. the ideal. Will be fun to take a look

They just don't listen.

Local boy---selling tickets.

OK, I knew what you ,meant with Wilson--call him Daisy if you want to---we are very close in opinion---but I am a bit interested in (at a later time--I think we will have time to break this down later----I really like Jones, and I like Fields, but the OSU curse bothers me. The Dalton comment may not sell him as well as you meant, but I know you are talking skill set, not overall talent or fit. So here is what I would like: What is the reason Wilson is ahead of Fields? Lance ahead of Fields? Maybe later we can compare the QBs like they do on Cars.com. I am of the opinion that Brady could covet Jones because he fits the "mold" he seems to prefer. Here are options (add / correct these) 1. We move up for Wilson (I am guessing Miami has to be the trade. That means we see Wilson as the face of the franchise because we are going to give up next year's #1 to get him and our second rounder to get him. If he is a franchise QB, worth it). 2. We sit move up a spot or two for Lance. 3. We sit at 9 and take Fields. 4. We trade back and take Jones. 5. We pick from the list you provide (Hearing a lot about Slater and Vera Tucker---draft deep at T )

If there is a surprise, it could be Jamie Newman at the Senior Bowl. He will be fresh, he has been working on mechanics for a year, and he will have coaches asking the coaching staffs to play him a bit more so they can see what he can do.

You are right, people supporting Trump. He should be playing golf--living a good life---the US represents 30% of the COVID-19 cases in the world, and only 4% of the population, and he pats himself on the back---encourages people to live their lives again because he is willing to risk those lives to stimulate the economy to get him re-elected. He WANTS to project a "return to normalcy". And if he were not playing golf, he might be attacking 60% of the nation by endorsing "white power" videos and plastering pictures of people removing statues...Important stuff like that--requires technology. He does not need to be in his office to publicly sanction Russia for putting out bounties on US Soldiers--he can ignore that, and focus his attention on white morons with Trump shirts on Golf carts shouting "White Power."

I can't quite recall who it was that criticized Obama for playing much less golf. Name is escaping me....The President leads by example. Playing golf when the nation is dying is not the vibe one might expect a leader to project. It demonstrates that his focus is going to be on chasing a white ball around a manicured landscape instead of being on the pandemic. Look at his twitter today--he is trying to get the people tearing down statues targeted. He is promoting a group shouting "White Power." Was he on the golf course when he tweeted these things? You are right-it does not matter.

This thread is titled correctly-- It will not go away either-- So we must be doing a good job, right?

In your response you blame someone else. You are well trained. About the mirror---I DID. I was a Republican my entire adult life--in that reflection, I said, "Can I support a con man? A corrupt failure of a human? Can I force myself to believe the lies?" I would be happy to send you that mirror with directions. Then again, how would a mirror serve a blind person?

I think they know it is all BS, but they endorse it because it gives their hidden agendas credibility. Every time he grabs some "emergency funding" or tax breaks, he gives the masses a taste and feeds the rich a full course meal. These red-hatted morons praise him for the taste. They are gas-lighted, propagandized, cult figures. When Trump no longer needs their vote--as will be the case if he is re-elected--and if he has the support of a loyal and equally-corrupt senate (Burr from NC, for example), he won't even have to lie to his cult. They will no longer be needed or useful. That is his pattern with everyone and everything in his miserable existence. They know not what they do.

A Travel ban, regardless of what Trump TV told you, is not consistent with measures other countries put in place BEFORE the numbers started increasing. We are tired of excuses and blaming others--why not produce some results? It is that simple. Are you all not tired of blaming hundreds of others for Trump's inability to do his job? (But they said he is doing a great job!) Worst president in American history by far. Should end up in prison, like so many of his staffers. Leaders don't point fingers. Leaders do not NEED a TV station to spin facts for you. Leaders do not need the support of gullible, mislead followers.

Blame the leader---not Nancy Pelosi. The fact that you all constantly need someone to blame is very telling---it is because you support an idiot. Cherry pick distorted facts all you want, but a true leader does not make excuses like you all do for him. He is a pussy--he is weak and stupid, relying on some news network to feed propaganda to those in the country who excuse or fail to see that he consistently and constantly shows you who he is. No, there is not some conspiracy to get the president--he shows us that he is unethical, criminal, and immoral all the time. Instead of chasing down his "look over there" finger pointing, why not give your allegiance to this corrupt loser some thought. You are getting played--you and a bunch of other gullible Fox viewers. I respect that as much as I do the National Enquirer, pro wrestling, and reality TV--all things Donald Trump has been involved with--imagine that. So when you try to support him--understand that this is the person we see you defending----not the character presented to you in lies and spin.

They aren't. You are trying to argue some ambiguous point when the many other stupid, careless, uninformed comments get a pass? Why do we have 1/3 of the cases in the world, and only 4% of the world's population? Read his public comments during February and March. The man let people die because he was worried about the economy. He politicized death. It was that simple. Period. Full stop. The data clearly demonstrates that our leader is a narcissistic dumbass.

Talk Facts---his ban was in part, based on the trade deals--trying to establish leverage. It was more rhetoric than anything else. But that is all Trump supporters need--they want to be lied to, obviously. Here are facts pulled YESTERDAY---If TRUMP was all over this, how do we have 1/3 of the world's cases (we have about 4% of the world's population)? Look at the deaths vs. the rest of the world. He could have led instead he passed the buck, blamed others, bragged with false statistics, and lied about his lies. These are the numbers. How do they reflect his leadership? If you defend this, you are closer to a cult member than a responsible citizen. He did not make America great, but we are #1!!! I am guessing Fox News has not shared the math with the Trump Chumps. Fake News, right?

So you are saying that Trump was proactive and all over this, even though the numbers vs the world do not suggest anything REMOTELY akin to what you are saying. You are spewing spin. Let's talk FACTS (not KellyAnne's version) and stop believing everything you want to hear oozing from the white house. This is your guy---after saying in March: "I always felt this was a pandemic. I was calling it a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic." Let's take a look, since the democrats are trying to bring down the President (these are his words--hint--if you don't like them, chant "fake news" like your training suggests): Here’s what the president said in public remarks, interviews and tweets from Jan. 22 to March 10 -– one day before the World Health Organization declared the global outbreak a pandemic. Jan. 22: “We have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China. We have it under control. It’s going to be just fine.” — Trump in a CNBC interview. Jan. 30: “We think we have it very well under control. We have very little problem in this country at this moment — five — and those people are all recuperating successfully. But we’re working very closely with China and other countries, and we think it’s going to have a very good ending for us … that I can assure you.” — Trump in a speech in Michigan. Feb. 10: “Now, the virus that we’re talking about having to do — you know, a lot of people think that goes away in April with the heat — as the heat comes in. Typically, that will go away in April. We’re in great shape though. We have 12 cases — 11 cases, and many of them are in good shape now.” — Trump at the White House. (See our item “Will the New Coronavirus ‘Go Away’ in April?“) Feb. 14: “There’s a theory that, in April, when it gets warm — historically, that has been able to kill the virus. So we don’t know yet; we’re not sure yet. But that’s around the corner.” — Trump in speaking to National Border Patrol Council members. Feb. 23: “We have it very much under control in this country.” — Trump in speaking to reporters. Feb. 24: “The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA. We are in contact with everyone and all relevant countries. CDC & World Health have been working hard and very smart. Stock Market starting to look very good to me!” — Trump in a tweet. Feb. 26: “So we’re at the low level. As they get better, we take them off the list, so that we’re going to be pretty soon at only five people. And we could be at just one or two people over the next short period of time. So we’ve had very good luck.” — Trump at a White House briefing. Feb. 26: “And again, when you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.” — Trump at a press conference. Feb. 26: “I think every aspect of our society should be prepared. I don’t think it’s going to come to that, especially with the fact that we’re going down, not up. We’re going very substantially down, not up.” — Trump at a press conference, when asked if “U.S. schools should be preparing for a coronavirus spreading.” Feb. 27: “It’s going to disappear. One day — it’s like a miracle — it will disappear.” — Trump at a White House meeting with African American leaders. Feb. 29: “And I’ve gotten to know these professionals. They’re incredible. And everything is under control. I mean, they’re very, very cool. They’ve done it, and they’ve done it well. Everything is really under control.” — Trump in a speech at the CPAC conference outside Washington, D.C. March 4: “[W]e have a very small number of people in this country [infected]. We have a big country. The biggest impact we had was when we took the 40-plus people [from a cruise ship]. … We brought them back. We immediately quarantined them. But you add that to the numbers. But if you don’t add that to the numbers, we’re talking about very small numbers in the United States.” — Trump at a White House meeting with airline CEOs. March 4: “Well, I think the 3.4% is really a false number.” — Trump in an interview on Fox News, referring to the percentage of diagnosed COVID-19 patients worldwide who had died, as reported by the World Health Organization. (See our item “Trump and the Coronavirus Death Rate.”) March 7: “No, I’m not concerned at all. No, we’ve done a great job with it.” — Trump, when asked by reporters if he was concerned about the arrival of the coronavirus in the Washington, D.C., area. March 9: “So last year 37,000 Americans died from the common Flu. It averages between 27,000 and 70,000 per year. Nothing is shut down, life & the economy go on. At this moment there are 546 confirmed cases of CoronaVirus, with 22 deaths. Think about that!” — Trump in a tweet. March 10: “And we’re prepared, and we’re doing a great job with it. And it will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away.” — Trump after meeting with Republican senators. A day later, on March 11, the WHO declared the global outbreak a pandemic. Now Trump wants to pull funding from them--because they made him look bad. That is the leader you support. Wake up.

Yeah--CNN is the problem. Thank God Fox News taught you to call all news that you don't like "fake." How would we know the truth without good ole' Fox News? I am a research professor and I teach validity and reliability every day. So before I chant "fake news" like a gas-lighted, water-boarded cult member, I look into the process of acquiring information. Your accusations (above) are not completely true and they mislead. You cherry pick as well. This source is one of the most valid, unbiased research outlets that has a very small margin of error. You can dismiss this as "fake" without knowing anything about it if you want; I get it, the truth hurts. You are not going to like this, so get your Bactine and start preparing your distracting, misinformed and uninformed rebuttal. :https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/