Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Husband creates 'sex starved' spreadsheet for every time he was denied


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

In four years I've been denied once and she asked if there was anything she could do. I asked her to juggle swords that were on fire while I watched Futurama. I was impressed that she only cut herself once

Sent from my XT1080 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

is that a euphanism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife showed me this last night and I told her how stupid it was...that made her fell good. Then I said...It's stupid because he went through all that work and stopped before it could have been awesome. I told her how he should have created pie charts, calculated to see if there were any correlations on dates or activities, and then examined the Sexcess of those dates. Mimic those activities to see if they were successful and then submitted the spreadsheet. 

 

 

I know right? There is so much information missing from this, could have been a gold mine for him later on if he had just put in a bit more work. 

 

I mean, at the bare minimum you need to be tracking her cycle in there somewhere, thats just basic poo.  Then you have to consider how and when you asked the question- cant just walk up to her while shes sitting on the couch, you've got to build up to it.  Talk to her a bit, get her in a good mood, cuddle up next to her on the couch, anything really. 

 

The study is basically set up for you- just need to change up the independent variable (how/ when you ask the question) and track the results on the dependent variable (sexy times).  Then randomize when you use the various approaches (ok today I'm giving her some chocolate and a neck massage), do a little statistical analysis with the other variables being recorded and voila.

 

I give him a 2/10.  Need much more thorough analysis before publication

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...