Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What we learned about today's game against Tampa Bay

KillerKat

By KillerKat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted

Rivera needs to stay away from his former self. Playing for a FG right before halftime was unacceptable.

Shula is still Shula. Calling failed plays time after time and wtf plays on 3rd down is what keeps points off the board. Yes he has good streaks, but that's it. Every drive he has at least a couple plays that leave you thinking "wtf?". He is the major thorn in the offense's side.

We really need Cam. If he is not on IR, you really have to question that he should've started this week. Fractured ribs isn't something that is going to feel better in a week. Makes me think Rivera reverted back to his overly cautious self. You need your best players on the field during division games. They count too much. You aren't guaranteed anything in the NFL.

Godfrey is terrible. Needs to be replaced asap.

Philly Brown looked more confident today than he did all preseason. Hopefully he keeps this up.

DWill still has it!

Our defense, although got a little soft after halftime, is still solid. Didn't look too bad for a first game. Can only only get better from here on out.

We can not rely on Luck and terrible QB play from the opposition every game. We need to fix the things above. I have a feeling if we were playing a more competent team, the outcome would be much different. Being conservative costs you games. We were lucky to come out of this with a win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cover2Safety33 Newbie

Cover2Safety33

Posted
Posted

Somebody stopped watching the game after the two minute warning. Get out of here with that negative poo.

We won a game against a healthy division rival with our back-up QB, new receivers, and a maligned O-Line.

 

How about this for what we learned?

 

 

The Carolina Panthers can close a game, on either offense or defense.

Our offense works very well with a back-up QB (imagine that with Cam).

Our defense picked up where we left off and our secondary is improved (did you see the corner play?).

 

ZERO TURNOVERS.

 

 

 

Now go home, KillerKat. We don't want your crap here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...