Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 WR Tracker (old vs new)


lindseyj14

Recommended Posts

Week 1

Old- 24 Targets, 9 Rec, 147 Yd, 1 Td

New- 13 Targets, 11 Rec, 124 Yd, 1 Td

Week 2

Old- 10 Targets, 6 Rec, 71 Yd

New- 19 Targets, 11 Rec, 146 Yd, 1 Td

2014 Totals

Old- 34 Targets, 15 Rec, 218 Yd, 1 Td

New- 32 Targets, 22 Rec, 270 Yd, 2 Td

Smith Sr- 25 Targets, 13 Rec, 189 Yd, 1 Td

LaFell- 6 Targets

Ginn Jr- 3 Targets, 2 Rec, 29 Yd

Benjamin- 16 Targets, 8 Rec, 138 Yd, 1 Td

Cotchery- 8 Targets, 8 Rec, 78 Yd

Avant- 8 Targets, 6 Rec, 54 Yd, 1 Td

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're a deep threat receiver away from having a nasty WR group, it's why I think losing Ginn was actually a bigger loss to the offense than Smith, we have nobody to replace that deep threat he had, even if he wasn't the best catcher, he always kept the defense guessing. If we can get Hill into shape then that could well be the answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn has a return TD that factors in.

  

He also has an annual $3.3mil salary that factors in. Neither are relevant to WR production, though.

Ginn had a TD, but also I don't get the point of this. These guys aren't Panther's anymore, let it go. Not to mention I think LaFell and Ginn are like 4th/5th on the depth chart on their new teams.

LaFell & Ginn are being paid 2nd/3rd option money by their teams. They're 4th/5th option in production because the suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn had a TD, but also I don't get the point of this. These guys aren't Panther's anymore, let it go. Not to mention I think LaFell and Ginn are like 4th/5th on the depth chart on their new teams.

 

Letting it go is exactly what all the whiners who said our WRs would be worse would love for us to do. We're expected to shut up and take it when they dish it out, then let it go when they're proven wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  

He also has an annual $3.3mil salary that factors in. Neither are relevant to WR production, though.

LaFell & Ginn are being paid 2nd/3rd option money by their teams. They're 4th/5th option in production because the suck.

 

It is relevant to comparing new WRs to old WRs because Ginn as a WR also contributed immensely to the return game. Philly has been solid so far, but losing Ginn in the return game was more than a minor loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is relevant to comparing new WRs to old WRs because Ginn as a WR also contributed immensely to the return game. Philly has been solid so far, but losing Ginn in the return game was more than a minor loss.

You wanna pay Ginn $3.3mil to return punts & drop passes?

He wasn't even that great as a returner last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Letting it go is exactly what all the whiners who said our WRs would be worse would love for us to do. We're expected to shut up and take it when they dish it out, then let it go when they're proven wrong.

 

Well then maybe the OP should mentioned Steve Smith, which is really what everyone has been clamoring about since the offseason. He should probably also mention Benjamin's drops today which I've read over and over was Smith's biggest knock. I know some of my friends, and myself, really wanted to keep Ginn as well, but Smith was really the only offseason loss that I've had conversations about. LaFell was expected to be cut from what we saw last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You wanna pay Ginn $3.3mil to return punts & drop passes?

He wasn't even that great as a returner last year.

 

He was a better returner than I've seen in a Panther uniform in about half a decade, but besides that I keep seeing you mentioning drops. I'd really like to see statistics, at their depth, of drops league wide compared to Ginn and Smith. LaFell I think everyone in Panther nation agreed was a goner by week 14 last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...