Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 WR Tracker (old vs new)


lindseyj14

Recommended Posts

Week 1

Old- 24 Targets, 9 Rec, 147 Yd, 1 Td

New- 13 Targets, 11 Rec, 124 Yd, 1 Td

Week 2

Old- 10 Targets, 6 Rec, 71 Yd

New- 19 Targets, 11 Rec, 146 Yd, 1 Td

2014 Totals

Old- 34 Targets, 15 Rec, 218 Yd, 1 Td

New- 32 Targets, 22 Rec, 270 Yd, 2 Td

Smith Sr- 25 Targets, 13 Rec, 189 Yd, 1 Td

LaFell- 6 Targets

Ginn Jr- 3 Targets, 2 Rec, 29 Yd

Benjamin- 16 Targets, 8 Rec, 138 Yd, 1 Td

Cotchery- 8 Targets, 8 Rec, 78 Yd

Avant- 8 Targets, 6 Rec, 54 Yd, 1 Td

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're a deep threat receiver away from having a nasty WR group, it's why I think losing Ginn was actually a bigger loss to the offense than Smith, we have nobody to replace that deep threat he had, even if he wasn't the best catcher, he always kept the defense guessing. If we can get Hill into shape then that could well be the answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn has a return TD that factors in.

  

He also has an annual $3.3mil salary that factors in. Neither are relevant to WR production, though.

Ginn had a TD, but also I don't get the point of this. These guys aren't Panther's anymore, let it go. Not to mention I think LaFell and Ginn are like 4th/5th on the depth chart on their new teams.

LaFell & Ginn are being paid 2nd/3rd option money by their teams. They're 4th/5th option in production because the suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn had a TD, but also I don't get the point of this. These guys aren't Panther's anymore, let it go. Not to mention I think LaFell and Ginn are like 4th/5th on the depth chart on their new teams.

 

Letting it go is exactly what all the whiners who said our WRs would be worse would love for us to do. We're expected to shut up and take it when they dish it out, then let it go when they're proven wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  

He also has an annual $3.3mil salary that factors in. Neither are relevant to WR production, though.

LaFell & Ginn are being paid 2nd/3rd option money by their teams. They're 4th/5th option in production because the suck.

 

It is relevant to comparing new WRs to old WRs because Ginn as a WR also contributed immensely to the return game. Philly has been solid so far, but losing Ginn in the return game was more than a minor loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is relevant to comparing new WRs to old WRs because Ginn as a WR also contributed immensely to the return game. Philly has been solid so far, but losing Ginn in the return game was more than a minor loss.

You wanna pay Ginn $3.3mil to return punts & drop passes?

He wasn't even that great as a returner last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Letting it go is exactly what all the whiners who said our WRs would be worse would love for us to do. We're expected to shut up and take it when they dish it out, then let it go when they're proven wrong.

 

Well then maybe the OP should mentioned Steve Smith, which is really what everyone has been clamoring about since the offseason. He should probably also mention Benjamin's drops today which I've read over and over was Smith's biggest knock. I know some of my friends, and myself, really wanted to keep Ginn as well, but Smith was really the only offseason loss that I've had conversations about. LaFell was expected to be cut from what we saw last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You wanna pay Ginn $3.3mil to return punts & drop passes?

He wasn't even that great as a returner last year.

 

He was a better returner than I've seen in a Panther uniform in about half a decade, but besides that I keep seeing you mentioning drops. I'd really like to see statistics, at their depth, of drops league wide compared to Ginn and Smith. LaFell I think everyone in Panther nation agreed was a goner by week 14 last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...