Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spotrac .com: Panthers have about 7.2 million to spend or carry over


Jmac

Recommended Posts

The Panthers have two and half healthy running backs left. They are falling like dominos due to the Oline letting them get pounded play after play. You can put a beat up franchise QB in that group also. If these guys keep getting smashed, this season will be over very quickly. Looks like we have around seven million under the cap at this time according to Spotrac. I know we have contracts coming up with our big two soon.Do you feel that our situation is dire enough to pull some money and put a package together for a viable trade with future draft picks involved.There doesn't seem to be many F.A prospects available that will really make a huge difference. Maybe a middle found pick and pull enough money to pay a guy like Roos. Is this situation at the point where they have to pull the trigger and worry about Cam (and luke) at a later date?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sadly I bet that money stay put unless we lay some serious egg or have may injuries. I'd rather line up TE in our backfield before spending another dollar on rbs. smh... the temporary answer is on our PS and becoming healthy. If they do spend that money anything outside of a OLINE "PROFESSIONAL" is ridiculous. Overall I think we are what we are in reference to that money. Fozzy must get better because he could actually somehow run with our Oline...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...