Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When your identity doesn't match your ability.


Cover2Safety33

Recommended Posts

We are supposed to be a run first team.

Obviously this is not who we are when Cam is injured and cannot run.

 

Is it time for us to focus on the passing game? Instead of running the ball up the middle for 1-2 yards, why not try a quick pass or screen as substitute?

 

I hate to say it because I do enjoy those physical games where the running backs take over, but we don't have those players at running back or O-line. So I say we move to an offence that works through the air. Roll Cam away from pressure (because our O-line sucks too much to expect a traditional pocket), and let Cam work the field. He has shown that he can move the ball through the air. We are just getting killed by drive-stopping runs for zero to little gain.

 

I no longer expect our running backs to break one for a touchdown on any play; I haven't felt that way since 2011. At this point, I have more hope that Benjamin, Cotchery, Avant, Bersin, Philly, or Olsen will make a nice reception with some YAC.

 

We do not have a physical offence. Our second TE gets almost no significant time. We cannot run the ball with authority (anything more than a three yard rush is a welcome surprise for us now). Why not switch to a more finesse offence? Let Williams and Stewart work against a D that respects the pass, thus opening up lanes for them instead of forcing them to make things happen. Williams has always been a threat in the screen game, and Stew is great with the read option (which NEEDS to come back as something to at least get Cam involved in the running game).

 

 

Basically, why not run a spread offence which Cam seems to be better suited for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly He's played two seasons and started 28 games. He's well beyond the point of being able to point to 2 or 3 games and being able to say, "THAT is the QB he is and will be in the future" Of course he can get there, but anyone trying to use just those couple of games to rank his place amongst the games QB's today and their full career's worth of playing at that level, is just asinine. Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow, Hurts, Herbert, Daniels, Stafford, Goff, Geno, Purdy, Baker, Love, Dak, Tua, Kyler, Lawrence That's 17 QB's right there that have played better over their careers than Bryce has played at his best.  And I'm not saying they're all studs or guys I'd want to be our QB moving forward, Tua for example I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but his body of work is a million times better than Bryce's has been. It's also not including any of the other QB's drafted in 2023/2024 other than Daniels. So again, say you believe in Bryce, say you think he's going to prove he can and should be our QB of the future, that's all fair and totally fine. But nobody can say he's been an above average QB in his career thus far, it's just an asinine notion.
    • I'd think we could get one of those from Dallas for... whatever. 
×
×
  • Create New...