Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

1st take destroys the Panthers FO, "Panthers Sold Cam Newton Out"


Recommended Posts

You're overthinking it. This is football. Accuracy mean the OL protect, WRs get open, the QB throw them the ball and they catch it. If none of that happen the QB is inaccurate. The broncos have 3 number one type receivers. They know he's limited so they surround him with talent. He's not surrounded with talents because he's great. Michael Jordan was never surrounded with talent. He was great. There are things Cam can do Peyton can't. And vice versa. I've seen Cam destroy defenses and take over games at will. Peyton can't do that. His receivers have to be on point for him to succeed.

 

You guys talk so much crap. Ball out quick, my ass!

And you obviously are underthinking it which means you have no clue what you are talking about.

 

Anyone who thinks that the receivers make Peyton or that he wouldn't be good even if he didn't have a great line knows nothing about what Peyton is about or why Denver is great.  Peytons line looks great because of Peyton not in spite of him. He knows where the pressure is coming from and gets the ball quickly.  He hits the open guy and checks down a lot.  He puts the ball right where the receiver can catch it.  He is hard to blitz because he picks you apart most of the time.

 

Peyton may be old but he surely is not limited.  And to say that Cam has destroyed defenses but Peyton hasn't even though his offense is one of the best in the league is ridiculous.

 

Talk about crap.  Nothing you have said rings true so why don't you bail out before you lose all credibility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
    • The changes to onside kicks were ridiculous and ruined a significant part of the game     It was already a high risk low reward play.  Why change it?
×
×
  • Create New...