Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets and Nets restarts trade talks


Jakob

Recommended Posts

The trade involves Joe Johnson for Henderson Williams and Stephenson, Per Woj. I'm gonna have to give that a big thumbs down. We would be down another big man and Gary Neal would be out backup SG.

 

Marvin is not a "big man." He's a 3 playing out of position.

 

I look at it this way: All three of those contracts were taking up roughly the same amount of cap as Joe's. Joe does what none of those three can do consistently: score. In order to survive the rest of the season with Roberts as the point guard and Biz starting at center, the wings HAVE to be upgraded to shoulder the scoring load, or else this team will continue to be painful to watch against bad teams and get blown out against good competition. Tanking at this point would be useless as it would only garner a top ten pick at best instead of top five.

 

At the end of the day, you're upgrading something that needs to be upgraded while keeping your young assets and picks and the players going out quite frankly weren't doing what they were brought in to do. Yeah, Johnson's contract sucks, but it's an expiring after this season and outside of Kemba no one on the roster is making double digit millions a year, so it can fit to serve its rental purpose.

 

It's a huge indictment on the offseason that was supposed to be, but kudos to Cho for realizing his mistake and trying to fix it. As Panther fans from 2008 to Hurney's eventual departure, we've seen what happens when GMs hope against hope for things to work themselves out.

 

I still feel like there's a trade for Al that will happen eventually, at which point we can begin building around the youth movement properly since the youth has kept us in the playoff hunt to this point.

 

FYI- this should open up some roster spots and CDR is available...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Johnson makes a little over $23 million. Trades have to be matched to within 15% I believe, unless Brooklyn has a trade exception I don't know about. We would have to give them back very close to $23 million. If they throw in another player we would have to throw in more salary. Theoretically we could get a 3rd team involved to absorb salary, but we'd have to give Philly some kind of asset (they are the only team with non negligible cap space)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...