Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Huddle Up with Cam Newton


The Huddler

Recommended Posts

You're right the only way Cam can be great is by leading his team to a comeback behind more than 30 points. Never mind the fact he has consistently executed when it counted the most these past 2 seasons. And lets just ignore that hes made huge, visible strides in his "leadership" throughout his career. (he had to-even his daddy said so--but when I mentioned this 4 years ago, it was blasphemy--now your ilk are bragging about the maturation)  And just forget the fact that his teammates have shown that they'll run through a brick wall for him (i.e. Brandon Williams) What?  Um, Ok The same teammates you say suck, correct?

 

First off, I never said the 30-point thing, Never said the 20+-point thing--but if you have to fabricate and twist to argue against my very simple comments, go ahead. Knock yourself out. Your entire rant is based on those erroneous statements.    You and a few others try to find any scrap you can to exploit when I make an honest comment about my perception (and most of the nation's) of Cam. What I wrote about Cam was generally very positive--but you find the one aspect that was critical and melt down.  Why are you so sensitive about Cam?  He has improved and needs to improve more to become great. He is not a top 10 QB yet. 

 

 See the bold section--something you call fact.  Cam, Gettlemen, RR--all have talked about consistency issues and mechanics. But you call his play consistent over the past 2 years.  Are the statisticians also biased and against Cam?  Let me tell you something about "when it counts."  All 60 minutes.  Ask the defense.

 

My post was pretty positive about Cam, and, frankly, what I believe not only to be the truth, but to  obviously be the truth.  It does not mean that I hate Cam or think he sucks--I think you and some of the others who attack me every time I make any comments about Cam are really not interested in the truth; you seem to have another agenda.   Again, you are wrong if that is the case, but just ignore my posts as you seem to ignore reality in this matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, I never said the 30-point thing, Never said the 20+-point thing--but if you have to fabricate and twist to argue against my very simple comments, go ahead. Knock yourself out. Your entire rant is based on those erroneous statements. You and a few others try to find any scrap you can to exploit when I make an honest comment about my perception (and most of the nation's) of Cam. What I wrote about Cam was generally very positive--but you find the one aspect that was critical and melt down. Why are you so sensitive about Cam? He has improved and needs to improve more to become great. He is not a top 10 QB yet.

See the bold section--something you call fact. Cam, Gettlemen, RR--all have talked about consistency issues and mechanics. But you call his play consistent over the past 2 years. Are the statisticians also biased and against Cam? Let me tell you something about "when it counts." All 60 minutes. Ask the defense.

My post was pretty positive about Cam, and, frankly, what I believe not only to be the truth, but to obviously be the truth. It does not mean that I hate Cam or think he sucks--I think you and some of the others who attack me every time I make any comments about Cam are really not interested in the truth; you seem to have another agenda. Again, you are wrong if that is the case, but just ignore my posts as you seem to ignore reality in this matter.

Ok, you win. What can I say, I just love my agendas :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton's efficiency was actually either consistent or improving his first 3 seasons before his fourth season when he had his entire WR core gutted, offseason ankle surgery, a rib injury, a back injury, and one of the worst starting OL's in the history of the franchise

 

Common sense should dictate that one season with the above factors should not be regarded as the norm. Unless you're an idiot.

 

Given a whole offseason to actually have the opportunity to get healthy and develop a rapport with his receivers will help tremendously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, you win. What can I say, I just love my agendas :)

 

I respect your loyalty and wish I felt as convinced--I think Cam will continue to evolve and I see this as the year he gets the weapons and the protection. We are on the same side, even though we see it differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...