Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Worst Game Preview By NFL.COM Of All Time (UPDATED)

Lilsmitty09

By Lilsmitty09,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted

I think your judgment of just how good these guys are is a little off.

If you really believe guys like Ty Montgomery and Matthew Slater would make quality starters, you've got a pretty bad case of the "grass is greener' thinking going on.

By the way, our franchise quarterback and team leader on defense are now locked up secure for the next five years at reasonable prices that won't destroy our cap.

So would you like to talk again about how you'd do things differently as a GM?

Anyway, those guys are about the same as Corey fuging Brown and Ted fuging Ginn.  And believe me, it's not difficult to give two players Top 5 at their position money.  If Hurney can do it, anyone can.  Bragging about Gettlemen doing something he's suppose to do, get the fug out of here with that bull poo.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Anyway, those guys are about the same as Corey fuging Brown and Ted fuging Ginn.  And believe me, it's not difficult to give two players Top 5 at their position money.  If Hurney can do it, anyone can.  Bragging about Gettlemen doing something he's suppose to do, get the fug out of here with that bull poo.    

Hurney couldn't do it because under his management we wouldn't have had the cap space (and didn't).

You might wanna remember that to lock up your top two players, you have to have the free cap space to do so, and just three short years ago we were actually 16 million over the cap.

Believe it or not, this isn't as easy in the real world as it looks on Madden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted

Hurney couldn't do it because under his management we wouldn't have had the cap space (and didn't).

You might wanna remember that to lock up your top two players, you have to have the free cap space to do so, and just three short years ago we were actually 16 million over the cap.

Believe it or not, this isn't as easy in the real world as it looks on Madden.

No poo, Sherlock.  Like I've stated numerous times, one Wide Receiver added wouldn't cripple the cap.  I've stated this several times.  Isn't common sense applied locking up your two franchise players, and finding a way so they don't cripple the cap?  I mean, shouldn't that be common sense if you're a good GM?  I also didn't state he was good at it (Hurney), but he did lock up a few players for Top 5 money.  And we are still paying for it (CJ).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

No poo, Sherlock.  Like I've stated numerous times, one Wide Receivers added wouldn't cripple the cap.  I've stated this several times.  Isn't common sense applied locking up your two franchise players, and finding a way so they don't cripple the cap?  I mean, shouldn't that be common sense if you're a good GM.  I also didn't state he was good at it, but he did lock up a few players for Top 5 money.  

All you want is one wide receiver?

Cool.  We have one.  He's just injured.  He'll be back next year though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted

You need to familiarize yourself with two important words, dude.

Long...Term...

Hurney adjusted year by year.

Gettleman thinks long term.

I expect you'll see the difference more clearly sometime in the next three to five years.

I know he's thinking long term, I perfectly understand that.  But we have the core group in place to win now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted

And we just might.

The season hasn't even started.

I hope you're correct.  I'm a pessimist fug face if you haven't noticed by now.  But sir, if we are winning by the Eagles game (I will be there), and you're around and about, I'll gladly buy you a beer for the waste of time we both spent arguing about this.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

I hope you're correct.  I'm a pessimist fug face if you haven't noticed by now.  But sir, if we are winning by the Eagles game (I will be there), and you're around and about, I'll gladly buy you a beer for the waste of time we both spent arguing about this.    

Don't drink, but appreciate the sentiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CRA · Posted

      Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
    • ForJimmy
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I guess you missed the point. His rushing attack was dead last yet his team still performed. That’s not Fox/Rivera ball. His QB also had a career year. Remember the same QB that played for us in the same division and was so bad he was cut?  Carroll coached after Lynch as well. In fact Canales was more involved in the more recent offense with Geno Smith and a good rushing attack. People are taking him wanting a rushing attack and assuming that means we are shutting down our passing attack. Again many of the top offenses like SF, Miami, and Detroit featured strong rushing attacks. 
    • Day1PanthersFan
      Never Let This Be Forgotten

      By Day1PanthersFan · Posted

      Too bad it was all for nothing because his dumbass goalie can't stay on his feet or control the puck when it's right infront of him 
×
×
  • Create New...