Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ted Ginn an X-Factor?


cpipster49

Recommended Posts

Im not sure on how much of an X factor he can be. From what I have read on Ted, is that he has a learning disability (self admitted). The Panthers utilize him on more simple routes etc. I hope we can get a little insight from him on AZ, but I dont anticipate very much. 

here is a link to his WIKI that talks a bit about it, but google it...there are articles out there. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Ginn,_Jr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are all looking at our last game & the plays and comparing it to what we think Arizona can do. BUT how about comparing Arizona's last game with Green Bay (we won't even bring up their last Seattle game) to what we can do. (1) They did not get a big lead on GB before letting GB & Rodgers come back to tie. (2) GB ran successfully on them. (3) Their secondary, Peterson included, could not stop Rodgers & the GB receivers who are named ................. EXACTLY! If they could not shut down the no-name GB receivers, do you really think they'll be able to stop Ginn, Cotchery, Brown, Funchess, & Olsen all game. NO. Absolutely not! Cam Newton is just as good as Aaron Rodgers, if not better this season. Our receivers are just as good as GB's. Through in a little throw to Fozzy or Stew or Mr. Bowling Ball now & then and we have so got this going our way all game long.

I'm saying that all our wide receivers will be the X-factors for this game. I have no doubt in my mind at all.

Here's some others who are also thinking this way: https://screen.yahoo.com/most-overlooked-nfc-championship-matchup-203030899.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...