Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking 1st Round Success: The last 10 years


L-TownCat

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2016/story/_/id/15414561/ranking-best-worst-drafting-teams-round-1-carolina-panthers-houston-texans-top-list
 

"It's no coincidence that more than half of the 2015 AP All-Pro team was selected in the first round of the NFL draft. That's where teams find talent, skill and athleticism rarely available later in the draft. Under the new CBA, these first-rounders no longer come at an exorbitant price, so hitting on a top pick also provides more value than a similarly productive free agent.

So which teams have hit more than they've missed? To answer that question, we utilized Pro Football Reference's Approximate Value (AV) metric to break down every first-round pick over the past 10 seasons."

 

A pretty neat list.  I cant say I disagree with any of their selections.   How would you rank them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was also a similar article looking at all draftees, not merely the 1st rounders, over the past 3 and 5 seasons. 

We had the fewest picks during that time period, but the greatest "bang for the buck" - i.e. the greatest added value per pick.  Very nice reading for those interested in analysis and metrics.

http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/62231/71/which-teams-draft-the-best?

I created a thread about it a few days ago, but not sure how many folks saw it as most folks were still talking about Josh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

There was also a similar article looking at all draftees, not merely the 1st rounders, over the past 3 and 5 seasons. 

We had the fewest picks during that time period, but the greatest "bang for the buck" - i.e. the greatest added value per pick.  Very nice reading for those interested in analysis and metrics.

http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/62231/71/which-teams-draft-the-best?

I created a thread about it a few days ago, but not sure how many folks saw it as most folks were still talking about Josh.

Again with the quality posts. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, at the time that wouldn't have worked for them. The truth is that when they had the biggest advantage in that conversation was also when Notre Dame was at their peak arrogance and revenue stream creation(prior to the Longhorns Network, etc). Notre Dame was just never going to work out. The biggest thing they could have done is go hard AF and try to give insane deals to the premier Big 12 teams. Even then, most of them were eyeing the Big Ten and SEC. The biggest issue with the ACC was betting wrong. Miami and Virginia Tech ended up being disasters. Basically former college football powerhouses that ended up being afterthoughts by the time they arrived. I mean Miami specifically have literally had a total of three double digit win seasons since they joined the ACC in 2004 and two of those are in the past 2 seasons. Virginia Tech just fell apart at the wrong time, although I think Franklin will bring them back to prominence to an extent. Had we had it to do in hindsight, probably taking teams like TCU, Baylor, etc would have been wiser options than some of the moves into the Northeast and getting Miami.   But, ultimately, fug all this nonsense. It's the insane greed of college football that killed regional rivalries, college basketball and entire storied, REGIONAL conferences. That is the real blame. The thirst for the destruction of all college sports which sits squarely at the feet of the slobbering, ignorant rednecks and hillbillies at the top of the college football sphere.
    • Im wondering how long it will take me to turn the game off
×
×
  • Create New...