Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My jake thread


tight lines

Recommended Posts

Since everybody else on the board has made a Jake thread I figured Id make one too. I was looking through some stats after someone claiming in another thread that 7 ints 2 tds and 2 fumbles through 3 games would get most other qbs benched. Here is what I found

Drew Brees 2007 season first 3 games

7 ints 1 td 2 fumbles.

Ben Roethlisberger 2006 season games 2, 3, and 4

7 ints 0 tds 1 fumble

M Hasselback 2004 season games 6, 7, and 8

7 ints 2 tds 1 fumble

Eli Manning 2006 season games 10, 11, and 12

6 ints 2 tds, 3 fumbles

Brett Favre 2008 season games 15, 16, 17

7 ints 2 tds, 0 fumbles and

2005 season games 8, 9 and 10

7 ints 2 tds and 1 fumble

P Manning 2007 season games 9, 10, and 11

8 ints 3 tds and 1 fumble

I got bored of looking after that but Im sure I could find plenty more examples discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the list of QBs you listed. They are future hall of famers except for maybe big ben who won 2 super bowls.

So you are saying a good or even a great quarterback can have a string of really bad games?

Favre by the way has done it more than once. He also has very similar career numbers to jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you think what Jake is going through is the same ailment that all those other QBs went through by just looking up touchdowns and turnovers.

lol

Thank you for making my point for me. Im not saying anything of the sort. As a matter of fact I would argue that there wasnt necisarily an ailment at all. There are a number of things that can cause interceptions. They can be bad decisions or poor throws. They can be miscommunication between the wr and qb. They can be great reads and or great efforts by the defensive players. They can be caused by forced throws. They can also be a combination of these factors.

Most quarterbacks are also more likely to throw them late in games when their team is behind. They try to force some extra throws in to do everything they can to help their team win. Sometimes they look like a genious in doing this. Sometimes they don't.

Frankly I dont think Jake has any major problem. It seems to me that the offense as a whole is just out of sync and not on the same page. The O lines problems have been quite obvious at times. Smitty and Moose have both had some of their own struggles as well as Jake. Davidson has looked like a bufoon a good bit himself.

I myself thing the biggest problem is this offense has strayed away from their strong points. The whole offense is built around a power running game. They havent called plays like one since last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no tight lines your point was disproving the statement that any QB that turns the ball over 9 times in three games would get most other QBs benched (keyword: most other QBs), but you counted all fumbles instead of fumbles lost. So fix that stat, and besides two QBs who are top 5 passers currently and play in passing offenses (Drew Brees, Peyton Manning) whose opposition knows they're going to throw, and who threw the ball 130 times and 115 times in their respective 3 game slumps, which is a stark contrast to Jake's 91 thus far in the season, you haven't debunked that statement at all.

now if you want to get technical, I'd add that both Brees and Peyton Manning looked more efficient throwing even with 4 and 6 interceptions in their worst games in that span, and Manning almost won his worst game. Jake wasn't even approaching that level against Philly.

maybe there is something else wrong with Jake that there isn't with these other QBs. and when you get into the effort of the pass defense, some QBs are easier to read than others. Manning audibles his plays at the line. He is the most cerebral QB in the nfl right now. His ability to read a defense to keep himself a step ahead puts him over the top of most in itself. Brees has precision and arm strength, and is more than adequate in the ability to read the coverage. Compared to the rest of the league, Jake is relatively easy at being read himself by the defense, and that is part of the reason why the receivers can't get open, and that is why they can make great plays on the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no tight lines your point was disproving the statement that any QB that turns the ball over 9 times in three games would get most other QBs benched (keyword: most other QBs), but you counted all fumbles instead of fumbles lost. So fix that stat, and besides two QBs who are top 5 passers currently and play in passing offenses (Drew Brees, Peyton Manning) whose opposition knows they're going to throw, and who threw the ball 130 times and 115 times in their respective 3 game slumps, which is a stark contrast to Jake's 91 thus far in the season, you haven't debunked that statement at all.

now if you want to get technical, I'd add that both Brees and Peyton Manning looked more efficient throwing even with 4 and 6 interceptions in their worst games in that span, and Manning almost won his worst game. Jake wasn't even approaching that level against Philly.

maybe there is something else wrong with Jake that there isn't with these other QBs. and when you get into the effort of the pass defense, some QBs are easier to read than others. Manning audibles his plays at the line. He is the most cerebral QB in the nfl right now. His ability to read a defense to keep himself a step ahead puts him over the top of most in itself. Brees has precision and arm strength, and is more than adequate in the ability to read the coverage. Compared to the rest of the league, Jake is relatively easy at being read himself by the defense, and that is part of the reason why the receivers can't get open, and that is why they can make great plays on the ball.

Pure conjecture!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has nothing to do with names, strictly matter of opinions, and guess what, mine has the same value anyone elses. I am not saying mine is any better than yours, or yours better than mine.....they are all just that, opinions, Peace & God Bless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...