Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Preseason Week 2, Sunday Games Thread


CarolinaSunday

Recommended Posts

Must not be too many people watching, Twitter is fairly quiet and nobody has started this thread yet. 

The Falcons are currently playing the Steelers.  The Falcons are basically imposing their will on the Steelers in the first quarter but the Steelers at least kept them out of end zone in their second scoring attempt. 

The Saints are playing the Chargers tonight at 8 EST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hoenheim said:

I don't think the steelers organization was too concerned with winning pre season games. Itll just be a roflstomp by the Falcons 

You could be right.  They are making a bunch of mistakes though that Tomlin can't be too happy with.  

I also think they just showed a graphic that the Steelers have had something like 3 first downs to the Falcons' 19 (I think that's what it said, I just caught it in the corner of my eye and I'm too lazy to rewind my DVR to see).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...