Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

which way dt/qb?

ownermode bm

By ownermode bm,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

ownermode bm Newbie

ownermode bm

Posted
Posted

I was noticing that with alot of underclassmen that should come out that alot of good prospects at both positions will be available. The thing is with no 1st at the moment which way do we go with our first pick. Prime example the kid from nebraska, gerald mcoy, the kid from syracuse, orderick, and my sleeper vince oghabaase from duke will flood the dt market(all dts 6'4 and over). A guy like oghabaase is a good guy who we could get with a 3rd rd pick but would have been 1st rd talent last year(11 sacks in two years at 6'5 305 and over 20 tfl)! Then you add in the qb depth with guys like pike, mccoy, lefaveour, hiller, The Golden Calf of Bristol,skelton and you have alot of qbs to choose from in rnd 2 and three. My assumption is fox is gone, we get a conditional pick for losing some free agents(hangman,mark jones, and the guard that went to chicago) and we are sitting with a high 2nd, and two thirds. With peps not coming back do we take a chance on a guy like quinn or Cambell and draft a dt first or go after seymour and draft a qb first. The new powers to be will definately have some options to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...