Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can CJ get some love?


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

It is in my opinion that Charles Johnson is quietly having a good season for us and yesterday was his coming out party. With all the talk centered around Peppers and Everette Brown, Johnson has had a solid start to the season. While his numbers don't necessarily jump off the page (8 tackles, 2 sacks, 2 FF) it always seems like he makes a play or two in a game either by hurrying the QB or creating opportunities for others. I'm torn on the whole passing down defensive tackle thing but even then he has got pressure on the QB. I really think he should be getting more playing time but it is actually the few positions where we have pretty good depth (linebacker being the other). Considering he is only 23 and in his 3rd season this is a guy who has improved and could be a Mike Rucker type player for us.

Just wanted to give him some love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

I submitted a post involving the emergence of Charles Johnson earlier and I noticed something about the Panthers that is interesting. This team is filled with young and talented players. Here is a list of guys 27 and younger:

DE: C. Johnson (23), H. Taylor (23), E. Brown (22), Position avg 25

DT: A. Burton (26), N. Hayden (23), IR C. Irvin (24), L. Leonard (25), Position avg. 29 (Only active players)

LB: J. Beason (24), J. Anderson (26), D. Connor (23), T. Davis (26), Position avg. 26

DB: C. Gamble (26), Marshall (24), Munnerlyn (21), Martin (25), Wilson (24), Godfrey (23), Teal (25), Harris (27), Position avg. 25

The offense isn't quite as young

OL: Otah (23), G. Williams (23), G. Schwartz (23), M. Bernadeau (23), Robinson (23), Kalil (24), Position avg. 25 (most of which are backups)

WR: Jarrett (23), Moore (24), Position avg. 28

RB: Williams (26), Stewart (22), Goodson (22), Sutton (22), Position avg. 23

QB: Moore (25), Position avg. 30.

We seem like we have a lot of youth on this team which is a good sign of things to come in the future. However we need some new blood in the wide receiving corps and obviously the QB position. But of any positions on a football team the OL and the QB is where you want your veterens.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...