Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton Ranked #25 on NFL Top 100


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Well, this is relatively interesting. Compared to SI and CBS’s Top 100, which both lack Cam, it appears NFL players at least know what’s up.

Also relevant: Matt Ryan is ranked below Cam Newton, at 29. 

Some decent quotes:

Jaguars LB Telvin Smith: “You talk about Brady being calm and collected in the pocket; Cam’s a cool cat”

Pretty much shows from an NFL defender from arguably the NFL’s best defense’s perspective on Cam. He actually is one of the better pocket passers in the league, and Smith realizes that.

The day Panthers fans and the NFL general fanbase realize this would be great. Sadly, it’s still a ways away.

Saints Defensive Coach: “Contain Cam. He’s the only thing they got”

100% facts. The best uninjured receiver in terms of draft position we had was drafted in the 6th round. The rest were UDFAs. Easy to see why they said that.

Saints DE Cam Jordan “Cam’s my least favorite QB to go against”

While his trash talk is trash and he’s generally been a trashy player, at least he respects Cam’s true skillset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

 

Saints Defensive Coach: “Contain Cam. He’s the only thing they got”

 

Thought that was a secret only The Huddle knew. 

Can't wait for the season.

We're going to have to find something else with all these weapons.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, saints4lifeagain said:

If Cams trash talk is trash, why does it upset Teh Huddle? And why is he a trashy player?

When did I say it upset me?

I said he’s a trash talker. Hell, we had Norman before so I understand. Trashy player meaning trash talker.

I don’t like Cam Jordan personally because he’s good and is on the Saints lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#73 Thomas Davis

#25 Cam Newton

Luke is probably the last one on the list 

 

Other comments : Mark Ingram doesn't belong in the top 100. They use him well but I just don't believe he's that good. Especially over Leonard Fournette.

JJ Watt plunged down the rankings

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...