Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Recognition for KK, Turner, and Moton


Recommended Posts

ESPN created a metric by which they can measure the success of the players in the trench. The two measures are Pass Rush Win Rate and Pass Block Win Rate. 

  • Pass Rush Win Rate
    • The player gets a win if they beat their blocks by 2.5 seconds as measured by chips worn in the players pads
      • They have a loss if they are unable to beat their blocks in 2.5 seconds
    • Rate is determined by totaling wins and losses and obtaining a ratio (percentage)
  • Pass Block Win Rate
    • The player gets a win if they hold their blocks for 2.5 seconds as measured by chips won in the players pads
      • They have a loss if they fail to sustain their block for 2.5 seconds
    • Rate is determined by totaling the wins against the losses and obtaining a ratio (percentage)

The 2.5 seconds used by ESPN is judged to be the average time from snap to pass for the NFL. I have to assume that the player reaches a certain depth on the defensive side to get a win, considering ESPN is simply evaluating results that a computer spits out based on the parameters assigned; in other words, it isn't artificial intelligence because humans assign the parameters and the computer does no additional learning beyond what it's programmed to do (AI doesn't exist, per the definition of the technology).

In 2018, Kawaan Short had the third highest Pass Rush Win Rate in the NFL with a PRWR of 34%. Aaron Donald was first at a whopping 46% and Chris Jones (Chiefs) was second at 35%.

Trai Turner had the highest PBWR for guards with 88% and Taylor Moton was the 4th rated tackle at 89%.

The Panthers overall had the number one rated Pass Rush Win Rate and number nine overall Pass Block Win Rate. It would seem that while the Panthers were beating their blocks, it was likely skewed in favor of only two or three guys who had trouble getting home because Washington called blitz plays what seemed like 75% of the time. Pittsburgh is a great example of this. Our defensive line could beat the offensive line, but the area vacated by the linebacker would be open all day for the hot route, which Pittsburgh exploited dutifully. 

 

ESPN+ PRWR//PBWR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

ESPN created a metric by which they can measure the success of the players in the trench. The two measures are Pass Rush Win Rate and Pass Block Win Rate. 

  • Pass Rush Win Rate
    • The player gets a win if they beat their blocks by 2.5 seconds as measured by chips worn in the players pads
      • They have a loss if they are unable to beat their blocks in 2.5 seconds
    • Rate is determined by totaling wins and losses and obtaining a ratio (percentage)
  • Pass Block Win Rate
    • The player gets a win if they hold their blocks for 2.5 seconds as measured by chips won in the players pads
      • They have a loss if they fail to sustain their block for 2.5 seconds
    • Rate is determined by totaling the wins against the losses and obtaining a ratio (percentage)

The 2.5 seconds used by ESPN is judged to be the average time from snap to pass for the NFL. I have to assume that the player reaches a certain depth on the defensive side to get a win, considering ESPN is simply evaluating results that a computer spits out based on the parameters assigned; in other words, it isn't artificial intelligence because humans assign the parameters and the computer does no additional learning beyond what it's programmed to do (AI doesn't exist, per the definition of the technology).

In 2018, Kawaan Short had the third highest Pass Rush Win Rate in the NFL with a PRWR of 34%. Aaron Donald was first at a whopping 46% and Chris Jones (Chiefs) was second at 35%.

Trai Turner had the highest PBWR for guards with 88% and Taylor Moton was the 4th rated tackle at 89%.

The Panthers overall had the number one rated Pass Rush Win Rate and number nine overall Pass Block Win Rate. It would seem that while the Panthers were beating their blocks, it was likely skewed in favor of only two or three guys who had trouble getting home because Washington called blitz plays what seemed like 75% of the time. Pittsburgh is a great example of this. Our defensive line could beat the offensive line, but the area vacated by the linebacker would be open all day for the hot route, which Pittsburgh exploited dutifully. 

 

ESPN+ PRWR//PBWR

Perfect example of what I said earlier in another thread. No d line is going to get sacks if the quarterback has 3 open receivers to throw to right off the bat for a 5 yard gain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw that post earlier, and thought this is spot on!!!

I also wanted to say, to the people that keep saying our line was trash, here's your proof!!! We can be elite, when we're not playing that soft zone crap. And it was way predictable!

Hence the reason for multi d looks this season, it was basically, for the opposing QB who's blitzing, Luke or Shaq, and that's where the balls going. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Any system that had the Panthers ranked #1 in pass rush win rate last season is insanely flawed. There's a reason why we drafted two edge rushers, signed another, and also signed a big money DL pass rusher. Our pass rush sucked last year. Period.

We blitzed a lot resulting in guys beating the defensive line. However, as the game in Pittsburgh shows (which I noted in the actual post), teams adjusted. Washington took Luke out of probably 15 plays that game by sending him on the same A, B gap blitz which vacated the middle of the field. McDonald or Connor would chip and go sit in that empty space each time. We were winning the match-ups but it didn't matter because the play design was flawed. 

Thus, our pass rush actually wasn't that bad but the back end planning and adjustments were piss poor. The evidence is in Rivera's own words, "we want to mix up looks more to become more unpredictable." We became so predictable that despite winning our match-ups our second and third levels were being exposed by vacated coverage zones. 

That's the truth, sir. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

We blitzed a lot resulting in guys beating the defensive line. However, as the game in Pittsburgh shows (which I noted in the actual post), teams adjusted. Washington took Luke out of probably 15 plays that game by sending him on the same A, B gap blitz which vacated the middle of the field. McDonald or Connor would chip and go sit in that empty space each time. We were winning the match-ups but it didn't matter because the play design was flawed. 

Thus, our pass rush actually wasn't that bad but the back end planning and adjustments were piss poor. The evidence is in Rivera's own words, "we want to mix up looks more to become more unpredictable." We became so predictable that despite winning our match-ups our second and third levels were being exposed by vacated coverage zones. 

That's the truth, sir. 

Sounds good in theory, but sorry, watching the games I saw QBs consistently stand tall in clean pockets for as long as they needed and/or wanted to stand there. The rush was non-existent. Not saying there weren't issues on the back end too because there definitely were, but Ron's defenses always have and always will have issues on the back end because his preference is to focus on the front seven, both schematically and in the investment of resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sounds good in theory, but sorry, watching the games I saw QBs consistently stand tall in clean pockets for as long as they needed and/or wanted to stand there. The rush was non-existent. Not saying there weren't issues on the back end too because there definitely were, but Ron's defenses always have and always will have issues on the back end because his preference is to focus on the front seven, both schematically and in the investment of resources.

We play a zone, if the QB has enough time someone is going to come open, that's a fact of life no matter who is playing DB. Go back and watch the Steelers game if you can stomach it. Count the number of times Luke blitzes on third down and the number of times Ben knew it was coming. 

Our pass rush wasn't that bad. It was the schematic of the backend which is why Rivera took over play calling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...