Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake Vs. Moore In Int's


Catdaddy

Recommended Posts

Jake and Matt as Panther's-Jake throws an Int every 30 attempts, Matt throws an Int every 20 attempts

thats the dumbest post ever written..whats your point?...let me guess you think jake deserves to start right?..you think jakes our best option right?..you think moore sucks right?..

prepare yourself for another loss under jake:cuss:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake and Matt as Panther's-Jake throws an Int every 30 attempts, Matt throws an Int every 20 attempts

And now if you will join us in the present. This season in 177 attempts Jake has thrown 13 INT which is a int every 13.6 attempts. In Matts only 3 reg season starts he threw for 115 times and only had 5 ints which is an INT every 23 attempts. That is an improvement if I am not mistaken.

This season is 177 attempts he has scored 4 TD's which is a TD every 44.3 attempts. In Matts 115 attempts he scored 3 times or once every 38.3 attempts. Also an improvement.

Bottom line Matt isn't all that good but Jake is worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can throw out meaningless overall stats too.

Superbowl Appearances

Jake Delhomme - 1

Matt Moore - 0

Delhomme is better :thumbsup:

Not only that, but Steve Smith has a career QB rating of 39.6 with only one pass attempt (incomplete) and Matt Moore's QB rating this season is 33.5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...