Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Good and The Bad . . .


Bama Panther

Recommended Posts

The secondary continues to allow easy completions. I have long disagreed with the 7-12 yard cushion that our starting CBs give, and I, for the life of me, cannot understand why it is given on every play. Sure, it has its advantages, but you must mix things up. Allowing the receivers to get a free release creates a vulnerability, and Eli took advantage of it last night.

We got an answer on this a short time back (I forget if it was newspaper or radio) but Fox prefers to keep the offense "in front of them", meaning that he's okay with giving up the short stuff as long as they don't give up the big play. Yes it gives up yards, but it's - conceptually - more effective in the Red Zone because the offense has less room to work and the defense less field to cover.

For the record, I really, REALLY hate that philosophy.

So what if you prevent one big gain? Ten short gains is just as bad, arguably worse since it takes more time off the clock.

You say you're good in the Red Zone? Cool, but seriously, why let them get that far? Why fight off the ropes? Why wait until someone is in your living room before you try to fend them off? Sheesh :rolleyes:

This whole 'bend, don't break' thing really wears a defense out. It's the reason why our defense all too often seems strong in the first and second quarter but fades in the second half. And that's, as often as not, when they give up those big plays that the defensive blueprint is supposed to prevent :nonod:

Fox was hired to be the Panthers head coach in part because of his aggressive style of defensive coaching. And yet each year, he seems to become less and less aggressive in his defensive philosophy.

I really don't get it :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • We had Darnold in a terrible situation for Sam Darnold and the team he's QBing. Darnold is best deployed as a high level game manager. He has elite throwing skills but he's disaster waiting to happen when he has to press and a QB has to press on a bad team. Seattle is a great spot for him surrounded with great weapons with an elite defense to lean on.  Swap him and Stafford last night and the Seahawks cruise while Darnold has 3-4 turnovers having to try to play hero ball for the Rams.
    • This picture was posted by the NFL back in September and shows Darnold and Maye at the front closest to the Lombardi trophy. I personally don’t believe in the “script” theory. I do believe that the NFL will influence specific games to get a more entertaining outcome at times. However, this is gaining some steam online and even got a response from NFL PR.  
    • In the last 5 years, nearly 10% of the NFL's starting QBs (19% of the NFC QBs) were / are (at some point) on the Panther's roster.  Of those QBs, their 2025 win percentage (regular season) was (combined-- the Seahawks, Bucs, and Panthers) won 30 of 51 games--nearly 60%--in 2025.  At an average of 10 wins per season, a team has a better than 90% chance of making the playoffs.  (Heck, I nearly added Caleb Williams to this forumula since we basically gave the Bears their QB as well). I
×
×
  • Create New...