Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Old interview with the new Director of College Scouting Cole Spencer


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

No connection with Fitterer that I've found, but his dad was a runningbacks coach at Ohio State when Pat Stewart was there.

Yeah could be. But it'd also be refreshing and different for people to just get interviewed and hired based on their merit and not based on friendship or association. Very refreshing, maybe almost 4D chess compared to the other 31 teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, blueandblackattack said:

Yeah could be. But it'd also be refreshing and different for people to just get interviewed and hired based on their merit and not based on friendship or association. Very refreshing, maybe almost 4D chess compared to the other 31 teams.

Sometimes the only way to know whether somebody is good or not is to know a guy who knows a guy.

Pat Stewart is actually said to have connections all over the league, so it wouldn't be surprising if some of our new guys were acquaintances of his.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, blueandblackattack said:

Seems like a cool dude that grew up on football. Not sure if there is any connection between him and Fitterer or someone else in that department, but wanted to dig up anything I could find and came up with this video when he was still with the WFT

https://www.washingtonfootball.com/video/meet-the-scouts-cole-spencer-20363618

He didn't mention Miami as a school he visits as part of his SE Regional remit.

Veto. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...