Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Play calling was fine.IMO


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

for the 1st half? with a run game like ours? with a QB like ours? Yes, that is WAY to pass heavy for this team.

being at 50/50 would have been dumb.

Why? Part of the reason were were in it was we made passing plays complement with out running. If the execution was right we wouldve played big. When you have rookie corners out there you test them. Its in part of that 'pass heavy' that we got to the red zone those three times. And as said before in we didnt drop all those balls we wouldve had longer drives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this and the bomb on 4th & 1.

WTF?? Keep the drive alive .....

And Jake DID make that 1 terrible INT but Smith is responsible for not catching the other 2 balls.

I think Smith has lost his mojo this season.

:lol: thats why he was running past the dbs who are rookies with 4.3 speed.right but still couldnt get a decent pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Part of the reason were were in it was we made passing plays complement with out running. If the execution was right we wouldve played big. When you have rookie corners out there you test them. Its in part of that 'pass heavy' that we got to the red zone those three times. And as said before in we didnt drop all those balls we wouldve had longer drives.

the reason Miami was up in that game...the entire game almost....is b/c we didn't pound the rock enough. The run game moved the ball up and down with ease....then they took them out of the equation and asked Jake to finish and he stalled everything.

Like I said before, the AZ game was the blueprint for how to win w/ Jake.

they opted for the Philly gameplan....and that is exactly what we saw. We saw it without the picks but it was the same gameplan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...