Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kampman Torn ACL


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

He is in a contract year.He does not fit in the 3-4..would get him at a bargain rate next year...would you take him?

According to Packers beat writer Greg Bedard, the initial prognosis for OLB Aaron Kampman is that he has a torn ACL.

Kampman, in the midst of a career-worst season, is dealt another blow in his contract year. He joins CB Al Harris as the Packers' second starting defender to tear his ACL in Week 11. Green Bay may not pursue re-signing Kampman in the offseason because he's not a good fit in their 3-4 defense. The injury may make Kampman a bargain addition for another team, however

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=1765

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell yes I would take him. He's the 2nd best DE in the league IMO and the best realistic option and probably the only option I would take if we were to trade Peppers. Peppers for him and a 2nd or 1st.

He's in contract year I don't see how we could trade Pep for him. I would love to get him though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Packers just placed him on IR

Packers placed OLB Aaron Kampman on injured reserve with a torn ACL, ending his season.

We knew Kampman was done for the year in mid-November, but the Packers oddly kept him on the roster for the last several games. Kampman, 30 last month, is headed for unrestricted free agency in 2010. He was miscast as an OLB in Green Bay's new 3-4 scheme, but should draw plenty of interest from 4-3 teams as a defensive end. His Packers career is almost certainly over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...