Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What position are not needed this offseason??


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

We’re not set at wr either with just Moore being only guy I think is legit ok. Hell I don’t think any of our wrs are any count especially not ol crybaby Anderson. Fans hurt his little feelings, poor guy. Hey Anderson keep catching ur garbage catches at the end of the game when they give u 10 yds. Good for you pal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would say RB but McCaffrey being out highlights what we lack. Then again we abandon the run too quickly. Depends on his health. It's like having Okung. When he's out there your good but can he stay out there is the question. 

Chubba will be better and bigger in Year 2. He has alot to work on this offseason. Esp blocking, hands, and ball security. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

We’re not set at wr either with just Moore being only guy I think is legit ok. Hell I don’t think any of our wrs are any count especially not ol crybaby Anderson. Fans hurt his little feelings, poor guy. Hey Anderson keep catching ur garbage catches at the end of the game when they give u 10 yds. Good for you pal!

Do you really want to use more assets on WR thoe?? All the angry at Robbie put aside he is going to be here next year regardless.. So that is Moore, Robbie, Shi, Zystra, and Marshall should be all here.. Do we really need to add more??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ColumbusCounty said:

Would say RB but McCaffrey being out highlights what we lack. Then again we abandon the run too quickly. Depends on his health. It's like having Okung. When he's out there your good but can he stay out there is the question. 

Chubba will be better and bigger in Year 2. He has alot to work on this offseason. Esp blocking, hands, and ball security. 

I was thinking about RB but we're stuck with CMC contract and Chubba going to be here.. I want to keep Abdullah.. So adding a big back at this point might just be a luxury.. With little resources we might not should be looking at luxury.. Even thoe I would love  bigger back.. Maybe Fullback if Rhule wants to keep this facade of wanting to run the ball more..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sign 2 veteran OL - in reality any of the positions would be an improvement.  Sign a decent bruiser back - we never should have let Davis leave IMHO. 

CMC to slot - NOT as running back! If he can't get onboard with this, then trade for young vets or picks.

Draft left tackle to build the base for future OL.  

Honestly we could have an improved team with just a few bodies - won't be a super bowl team, but wouldn't take much to be an improvement over this crappy product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce isn't a risk-taking gunslinger.  That's just QB DNA.  No one has ever said that is what we were drafting when we went that route.  That's my point.  That's not Bryce. Can you make Alex Smith throw deep? Sure.  He will occasionally.  In the reverse, can you ask Brett Favre to just take the easy layups? Sure.  He can in moments.  But in the end, they are what they are.  as I have said, Canales probably could win more games with PJ Walker.  And Bryce is a better overall QB than PJ.  PJ Walker would also have much worse games mixed in that Bryce would.   
    • From what i see, Canales offense requires a QB that is willing to take chances to maximize the offense. XL is also the kind of receiver that needs a qb to be risky to bring out his full potential. Its just a matter of if Bryce is gonna be that QB.
    • Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.  And last year was asked to be what he was.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
×
×
  • Create New...