Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sooo, Jake... About that $20 mil?


MisterJiggyFly

Recommended Posts

All this talk of our next quarterback, but no one seems to really address the fact that after this season Jake is still on the payroll to the sum of $16 million (and, correct me if I'm wrong, but he gets this even if he rides pine for 4 years or gets cut tomorrow).

Realistically, what bearing does this have on his future? Does the management swallow its pride and take a huge shot to the balls by benching or firing Jake if it comes to that at some point? Does he get to keep the job forever just on principal, like he is now?

I'd like to know what the real options are because I don't completely understand the NFL from a management perspective (then again, neither do the Panthers). Based on what I know it seems pretty unlikely that 09-10 is Jake's last season as a Panther. :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this talk of our next quarterback, but no one seems to really address the fact that after this season Jake is still on the payroll to the sum of $16 million (and, correct me if I'm wrong, but he gets this even if he rides pine for 4 years or gets cut tomorrow).

Realistically, what bearing does this have on his future? Does the management swallow its pride and take a huge shot to the balls by benching or firing Jake if it comes to that at some point? Does he get to keep the job forever just on principal, like he is now?

I'd like to know what the real options are because I don't completely understand the NFL from a management perspective (then again, neither do the Panthers). Based on what I know it seems pretty unlikely that 09-10 is Jake's last season as a Panther. :confused:

Probably depends on who the coach is next year. If Fox stays things will probably not change much. Sorry can't answer the options part. I (like the Panthers) don't understand much about NFL management either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a 0% chance that Jake Delhomme will be the starting quarterback for this team next year. If we have a new coach (and we probably will), then Jake will be cut or his contract will be reconstructed yet again so that he costs nothing to have here as a backup. If, God forbid, Fox returns next year, then Jake will return as a backup. But even Fox would have to look to bring some legitimate competition in here whether it be a rookie or a veteran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a 0% chance that Jake Delhomme will be the starting quarterback for this team next year. If we have a new coach (and we probably will), then Jake will be cut or his contract will be reconstructed yet again so that he costs nothing to have here as a backup. If, God forbid, Fox returns next year, then Jake will return as a backup. But even Fox would have to look to bring some legitimate competition in here whether it be a rookie or a veteran.

i don't think that jerry richardson will fire john fox after the season is over...and as long as john fox is our head coach then jake will remain our piece of poo starter...think about it..as a coach john fox cant get any worse than he has been already this season.. and jake cant get any worse than hes been this year and he is still our starting QB...even if we lose the final 6 games which i predict we will lose atleast 5 of the last 6..we our stuck with fox and delhomme..:frown5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a 0% chance that Jake Delhomme will be the starting quarterback for this team next year.

You don't even seem to believe that. Here's why

If we have a new coach (and we probably will), then Jake will be cut or his contract will be reconstructed yet again so that he costs nothing to have here as a backup. If, God forbid, Fox returns next year, then Jake will return as a backup. But even Fox would have to look to bring some legitimate competition in here whether it be a rookie or a veteran

IF≠ given. Jerry could decide to maintain continuity in the staff and justify it by the injuries. Should Fox and company stay, Jake is the starter because there is nothing in FA this year and we won't start a 2nd round rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jerry Richardson won't tolerate Jake coming in as the starter with no competition again. Merchandise sales are already plunging for the team during the peak shopping part of the year and you can bet your ass that concession sales are going to plunge for our remaining home games.

We're a fan base without hope that is slowly not caring about the team anymore because people know that we have no chance with Jake Delhomme. Richardson will see to it that that won't be an issue again next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jerry Richardson won't tolerate Jake coming in as the starter with no competition again. Merchandise sales are already plunging for the team during the peak shopping part of the year and you can bet your ass that concession sales are going to plunge for our remaining home games.

We're a fan base without hope that is slowly not caring about the team anymore because people know that we have no chance with Jake Delhomme. Richardson will see to it that that won't be an issue again next season.

The key is in how you define competition. Some here think Moore is the competition. Others think McCown with his variety of experience is. The rest of your post is speculating on what you think Jerry will do. He puts a lot of focus on leadership. That combined witrh the fact that jake's last 4 games have been way better than the first 4 this year may be enough to make Jerry good with keeping him. That plus the fact that he already paid 20 mill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina will offically be out of the hunt this week.....as Jake loses another. Fox will be gone.

Fox refuses to acknowledge his QB is done and current backups (as bad as they are) can't be a bigger liability despite not knowing the offense as well as Jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake Delhomme will be 35 years old coming off the worst year he's ever had, worse than any other starting quarterback in the league. It would be asinine to assume that him going from atrocious to mediocre over his past four games would be enough to keep him for next year, especially since he managed to lose the Dolphins game for us just less than a week ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake Delhomme will be 35 years old coming off the worst year he's ever had, worse than any other starting quarterback in the league. It would be asinine to assume that him going from atrocious to mediocre over his past four games would be enough to keep him for next year, especially since he managed to lose the Dolphins game for us just less than a week ago.

You seem to be just looking for a scapegoat. There were other issues outside of Jake's control that contributed to the losses.

BTW WHich veteran does your crystal ball say will be better than Delhomme next year?

It's always a gamble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can agree that he's not the same traditional tight end as say Warren but he's not that different from Loveland in a guy that plays more like a slot HVAC type row I don't think they're that much there He's probably not as good a route runner but with all that said none of them are the athlete that he is so it's kind of a watch there can I save for a fact that he's going to elite player probably not  You're asking for a wide receiver 3 and that's kind of what this would be in a way but accept bigger and just as explosive he's faster than all the guys that you would find at this point in the draft to feel a slot need and he's a red zone weapon with size verticality and such I think he's just a bigger mismatch than those guys you name Yes your banking on potential I think he's a bigger threat to make a play after the catch just based off strength size and just dog. I can't say I know what the Panthers look for in terms of arm length at the tight end position because we haven't drafted an elite first round tight end almost ever but if I'm looking at the way they have made their moves this offseason they drafted to where they don't have to reach it need and they've addressed most of those needs and this is one of the secondary needs that fit the draft range and if available there's a good chance that's a deep will be gone by time we pick I think you're blessed if he does fall to 19
    • What you are going to see from MHS831, your "source for Panther Predictions that are Unlikely to Happen but if they did, they would be 'real cool,'" is a position-by-position breakdown of needs that we seem to have normalized.  Tight End:  The team is looking for a "game-breaker" and to improve upon a 24th-ranked red-zone offense. Though they have brought back their own players for depth, the organization is looking for more competition to improve the position's overall impact.  In 2025, the unit averaged 8.1 yards per reception, failing to consistently stretch the field or provide a "scary" threat to opposing defenses.  I think they were hoping that Sanders would be that person.  He is not.  I have read some Huddlers demanding the "all-around" TE, and that point is valid.  However, you have to think about the focus on developing Young and the new age TE in the NFL.    "The Carolina Panthers have heavily utilized multi-tight end sets, ranking among the top NFL teams in using 13 personnel (three tight ends)—a strategy they employed on 7.8% of plays during the 2025 season. Under coach Dave Canales, the team employs these formations to bolster the run game and create diverse passing matchups."  This is why a seam-busting, pass-catching TE is so critically important for the Panthers.   This need is perhaps much bigger than we realize.  Do not discount the possibility of drafting Sadiq if he is there; I have seen him in the top 15 frequently. Too many drops for me, personally, and I am not a fan of a TE in round 1 (gotta think salary cap--grab a position that normally gets a high salary on the second contract--not a TE)  Stowers in round 2 is also an option.  I am intrigued by Trigg, a TE who should be drafted in the third round. Let our interest in Njoku demonstrate the kind of TE we seek right now.  Do we need blocking TEs?  Yes, but in a two or three WR set, maybe not as much as a traditional TE. I get the feeling we are not finished at TE.  (Njoku?  I am predicting that he goes to Chicago or Baltimore or Miami--Chicago #1)  
    • I'm not disagreeing with Bryce not being elite I think he's just middle of the roads kind of guy and maybe that's all he'll ever be but that might be enough to win after what we've seen with Donald I think you have to build around that and add people who can make him look better just like Jackson Smith did with Donald they also had an elite back in the backfield that help and an elite defense.  I think McMillan is nice but you don't have anyone that really strikes fear and defenses deep or anything anything to keep defensive honest I understand you feel like they neglected defense in the draft when most of the time after the first pick they stuck to their defensive guns and then you spend your entire offseason market on the defense The defense isn't really the problem The defense was drastically improved in average and you added a pro bowler and another guy who could be a top 10 rusher like how much more do you want to invest in the defense  You know what was the problem we couldn't score 21 to 28 points consistently and if you're stuck with Bryce you have to find another way to make that number look better IE playmakers somebody to is a threat to score every game that can open things up That's where you get better at not just making a strength stronger like that's not the reason you lost to the Rams
×
×
  • Create New...