Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Preview of the game from nola.com..


adallastiger

Recommended Posts

Former Saints quarterback Jake Delhomme (14 touchdown passes, 12 interceptions) has had the kind of season that might get him benched if not for the NFL's fourth-ranked ground game

They lost all credibility with that nonsense

To be honest, Jake is not having the best year, look at this from the NFL.com stats:

58.9% Completion percentage (24th in league)

14 TD to 12 INT (17th most TDs; 10th most INTs) TD/INT Ratio: 0.857

* A lower ratio is better (0.0 would be perfect)

3,038 passing yards (16th in league)

7.7 yard avg per pass play (6th in league)

Not stellar numbers, except the avg yards per play. He has made plays this year, but for those of you who crucify our defense, you'd better understand that they have saved Jake's bacon many times this season. Jake should be buying the Oline & the RBs Rolex watches for Christmas!

I love jake, but we need to draft & develop a more consistent QB. Look at Jake's stats compared to Matt Ryan (Rookie/Falcons):

61.7% Completion percentage (17th in league)

* Better than Jake

15 TD to 9 INT (16th most TDs; 23rd most INTs) TD/INT Ratio: 0.600

* Better than Jake

3,280 passing yards (11th in league)

* Better than Jake

7.9 yard avg per pass play (3rd in league)

* Better than Jake

I am in agreement that the N.O. papers are not the best sources for Panther info, but that statement, IMO, was accurate...if the team was losing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding my post above. I did not cherry-pick information...#1 because I am a Panthers diehard & #2 I used what I feel are the most important QB stats for my analysis. (the very most important is 'Games Won'...we all know that!)

I choose not to use QB Rating, b/c I think it is flawed. (for the record: Jake=82.4/158.3 & Matt Ryan=89.7/158.3)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, Jake is not having the best year, look at this from the NFL.com stats:

58.9% Completion percentage (24th in league)

14 TD to 12 INT (17th most TDs; 10th most INTs) TD/INT Ratio: 0.857

* A lower ratio is better (0.0 would be perfect)

3,038 passing yards (16th in league)

7.7 yard avg per pass play (6th in league)

Not stellar numbers, except the avg yards per play. He has made plays this year, but for those of you who crucify our defense, you'd better understand that they have saved Jake's bacon many times this season. Jake should be buying the Oline & the RBs Rolex watches for Christmas!

I love jake, but we need to draft & develop a more consistent QB. Look at Jake's stats compared to Matt Ryan (Rookie/Falcons):

61.7% Completion percentage (17th in league)

* Better than Jake

15 TD to 9 INT (16th most TDs; 23rd most INTs) TD/INT Ratio: 0.600

* Better than Jake

3,280 passing yards (11th in league)

* Better than Jake

7.9 yard avg per pass play (3rd in league)

* Better than Jake

I am in agreement that the N.O. papers are not the best sources for Panther info, but that statement, IMO, was accurate...if the team was losing.

Stats are for losers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats are for losers.

Wow, you are brilliant. If you can't offer critical analysis, why waste anyone's time? Colloquialism is for losers.

Throwing 4 freaking INTs in a game is for losers, but our team consistently wins. Credit Fox and his coaches for getting this team ready to play. I love Jake, but he needs to step his game (he has had some good games, but also some ridicuous ones). If this team keeps Jake without developing a young QB to take over, be ready to lose for the next 3-4 years after this or next year.

Just as many of us wanted this team to use the obviously better player in D.Will over Foster, a QB is necessary for this team to continue to play at a SuperBowl level.

Argue if you want, but don't come up with crap when we are losing b/c the team cannot make up for Jake's mistakes & then watch it take 3-4 year to recover. Think forward, not with your emotions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, you are brilliant. If you can't offer critical analysis, why waste anyone's time? Colloquialism is for losers.

Throwing 4 freaking INTs in a game is for losers, but our team consistently wins. Credit Fox and his coaches for getting this team ready to play. I love Jake, but he needs to step his game (he has had some good games, but also some ridicuous ones). If this team keeps Jake without developing a young QB to take over, be ready to lose for the next 3-4 years after this or next year.

Just as many of us wanted this team to use the obviously better player in D.Will over Foster, a QB is necessary for this team to continue to play at a SuperBowl level.

Argue if you want, but don't come up with crap when we are losing b/c the team cannot make up for Jake's mistakes & then watch it take 3-4 year to recover. Think forward, not with your emotions.

I think he's just joking as thats a famous John Foxism, it's thrown around anytime stats are brought up, even if they are positive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, you are brilliant. If you can't offer critical analysis, why waste anyone's time? Colloquialism is for losers.

Throwing 4 freaking INTs in a game is for losers, but our team consistently wins. Credit Fox and his coaches for getting this team ready to play. I love Jake, but he needs to step his game (he has had some good games, but also some ridicuous ones). If this team keeps Jake without developing a young QB to take over, be ready to lose for the next 3-4 years after this or next year.

Just as many of us wanted this team to use the obviously better player in D.Will over Foster, a QB is necessary for this team to continue to play at a SuperBowl level.

Argue if you want, but don't come up with crap when we are losing b/c the team cannot make up for Jake's mistakes & then watch it take 3-4 year to recover. Think forward, not with your emotions.

c'mon... you're talking about jake here. you think anybody in these parts is rational when criticisms of him surface? BDJS are ten times worse than peppers apologists (i'm one of the latter).

but srsly, very lucid well thought out retort. couldn't have said it better myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, you are brilliant. If you can't offer critical analysis, why waste anyone's time? Colloquialism is for losers.

Throwing 4 freaking INTs in a game is for losers, but our team consistently wins. Credit Fox and his coaches for getting this team ready to play. I love Jake, but he needs to step his game (he has had some good games, but also some ridicuous ones). If this team keeps Jake without developing a young QB to take over, be ready to lose for the next 3-4 years after this or next year.

Just as many of us wanted this team to use the obviously better player in D.Will over Foster, a QB is necessary for this team to continue to play at a SuperBowl level.

Argue if you want, but don't come up with crap when we are losing b/c the team cannot make up for Jake's mistakes & then watch it take 3-4 year to recover. Think forward, not with your emotions.

While you present some stats to suggest that this is not one of his best years, the rest of your argument holds little water.

For example Jake is recovering from major surgery and missing almost a whole year, so the obvious rust was going to be there. Plus his throwing motion needed to be recreated after he had to modify over the past few years to compensate for injuries, poorer arm strength, etc. You look at his interceptions but forget ignore that nine of those interceptions were in 3 games and of those games we won 2 of the 3 so his interceptions didn't hurt the team. Also note that his TD to int ratio is going to be low since he has thrown less touchdowns because we have scored most of our touchdowns running the ball. Even Jake has run in 2 this year. It doesn't mean he is doing worse as much as he has other weapons and doesn't need to throw TDs in the redzone this year.

And to say we need to develop a quarterback ignores we have Moore and have been developing him. Plus if you had made this argument in 2002 when we had Rodney Peete it would have ignored the fact that Delhomme was picked up as a free agent andcame in immediately and lit it up. We could just as easily pick up a backup who could be the next Delhomme for us.

So overall your logic is weak and your conclusions are speculative at best. The stats you use don't correlate to your conclusions nor do they accurately depict our season or current 11-4 record. Jake can ply a few more years and he surely has the skills to take us all the way. If and when we find his replacement we can see what they can do. But I have found that these things have a tendency to unfold in unpredictable fashion so speculation tends to be a waste of time usually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...