Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Digital cameras?


Hawk

Recommended Posts

so I asked the resident pro, but you know he never responds to pm's!!!

Any of you recently bought a digital SLR?

I am looking to buy one for my wife for Christmas. She doesn't like the little pocket digitals we have and keeps using the old Rebel EOS and I hate paying to get pictures developed!!!

Mostly for pictures of the kids etc, but I like the idea of being able to use it at games etc and wildlife etc.

Been to a few really good review websites, but now I'm looking for personal opinions/experiences.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just bought this camera from a store in the south called brandsmart here is the camera...it is the canon rebel t1i...I got it for 671 open box with the lens included.

85dd8c0f-0ef2-4fd4-b04a-b327e5fb871e.jpg&size=4&dhm=a534571e&hl=en

not cheap tho

http://www.butterflyphoto.com/prodinfo.phtml?id=7859&ref=Froogle_New

Not bad at all. Did it come with the free accessories of the one with the link I posted? Bag, etc.??

That is still a great deal on a 15 MP Cannon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bad at all. Did it come with the free accessories of the one with the link I posted? Bag, etc.??

That is still a great deal on a 15 MP Cannon.

mine came with the lens...but I had to pay for the bag and a sdic card...alltogether game to about 720...cant beat that deal...but I didnt buy it online..the deal I got cant be beat online...but that deal for the xsi is awesome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...