Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

do you idiots not see the real problem???


beasonfanclub

Recommended Posts

3rd and 5, from the 8, up by 7, I kinda like handing it to the running game and taking the points over throwing into traffic in the endzone.

Since we see how well that worked for Tampa.

But hey, what do I know. Seems like we throw, people cry we should've run. We run, people cry we're too conservative.

Well in fairness, its not necessarily the same people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davidson was calling the plays last year wasn't he? Our offense scored 414 points (top 10 in the NFL) with an average QB.

Offensive and defensive coordinators get to much of the blame, and occasionally to much of the credit.

So what! That was last year! What the hell did he call in the playoff game? Jake to keep standing back there and throw! No lineman coach should be offensive coordinator! Davidson sucks Bad! John Fox too! Put both of them under the stadium!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what! That was last year! What the hell did he call in the playoff game? Jake to keep standing back there and throw! No lineman coach should be offensive coordinator! Davidson sucks Bad! John Fox too! Put both of them under the stadium!!!!!!!!!!

He is the greatest offensive coordinator ever. They should put a statue of him on both ends of the stadium. Only Olinemen and fieldgoal kickers should ever be allowed to be offensive coordinators.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL has changed! you have to score points! do anybody know what that means!!!!! Guess not! We ran the same formation for at least 80% of the game like pop warner! They need to go!

Yea, because no other coach would simplyfy the game plan for a QB who had only started three games previously. Well, actually most of them would, but thats beside the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, because no other coach would simplyfy the game plan for a QB who had only started three games previously. Well, actually most of them would, but thats beside the point.

How much simpler can you get! Plays on one side of Davidsons play calling sheet! We have 10 plays at the most! My son high school team has a more plays than the panthers! Davidson is pooh compared to Henning! :mad2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The year he had another edge rusher opposite him in Reddick, Reddick ended up having more sacks. Burns was good at rushing the passer here but he was taken out of plays far too often by a single TE or you'd never even known he was in the game at all.  The Rams offer was equivalent to prime Khalil Mack or a TJ Watt. Those guys single handedly took over games and stopped drives. I can't remember a game Burns ever did that. Do we wish we had the level of production hes giving right now? Of course. Do I think we'd have it here. No.  At the time, his production was on par with Reddick, not Parsons. Pay production and incentivise potential. 
    • Technically our guys are in the top 6 in sacks for rookies and Scourton is tied for the lead.
    • That's why so many said he wasn't worth it here, there was only DB and it wasn't enough. If Burns is feasting then the other guys in NY are doing enough already, Burns is just collecting the stats. It's what he eas built for and is finally in his perfect space to succeed. Im not as in on the new guys yet. More is an understatement but the good news is that they are rookies.
×
×
  • Create New...