Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

who do i start at WR this week?


Sheldon Wolowizard

Recommended Posts

Tough call...but believe it or not...Carolina IS pretty high in pass D.

You still play your stud though.

Nice selection to pick from. I'd say definately Moss/Johnson. I don't like any NO WRs as Brees shares it around too much. Austin will get his. But being PPR it might balance out. I guess it falls to who's playing where. If Austin is in SD...with Cromartie on him...I'm thinking the edge might go to Meachem...and in Meachem's case you know wherever they are they're in a dome (lot of offense).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd go with my gut and start the first three (and that's not your gut, it's mine).

But, you know, something is really telling me that Austin will have more upside than Moss tomorrow. Trying not to be a homer, the Panthers haven't really let any WR go off on them (except Meachem [and Henderson]), so Moss may have a time of it. I am thinking that Welker will be the go-to guy tomorrow. Miles Austin may outdo Moss. Meachem in't a big name guy, but he has been going on a tear since he burned Carolina, so it borders on lunacy to sit him, and you're never going to sit Johnson.

BTW, make sure you look to see if Brady is playing. This should affect your decision greatly (ie, no Moss).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...