Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Richard Marshall in over his head?


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

I really like him, but the more I see him, the more he aggravates me. Antonio Bryant owned him all day Sunday, and he hasn't been the first. Granted, most of it was a height advantage, i still have my reserves about the guy. Im really worried about him matching up with Welker. can you imagine what will happen when Moss moves over Marshall for the big play? hopefully Gamble will blanket him all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing that Bryant was out the league for a few years. Sure his character was in question, but he did well in SF considering their QB problems and has a knack for some spectacular catches. He is performing well this season despite missing a couple of games, so I am not too concerned about our troubles keeping him contained.

I would be more worried about how they suddenly realised Winslow was open a lot. If they had targeted him like they did towards the end, then we were in trouble.

Someone threw out a stat that Marshall's side is generating a QB rating of 40. I would love to have that confirmed or denied, as like most I am a little unsure of Marshall. If it is true, then it is clear that we, as fans, do not know what the coaches can see ;)

Oh and Munnerlyn on Welker all day, I do not care if he even gives PIs. Welker is so dangerous after the catch, we just need to prevent it getting to him. Have him jump on his back all game. Frankly I am more concerned with Gamble. No way he contains Moss. In my mind Gamble is no worse than Marshall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...