Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No revenue sharing= NFL being the Big 12?

pstall

By pstall,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

pstall Newbie

pstall

Posted
Posted

Good write up on a current comparison of a hybrid revenue sharing program the Big 12 has.

As a comparison, look at the Big XII conference in football. The Big XII (and every other college conference) is bound by a salary cap with player salaries = $0. When it comes to TV revenues, the Big XII operates under a split-pool revenue sharing system* where all television revenues are pooled together. Then half of the pot is divided up evenly among the 12 teams and the other half is divided up among the teams depending on how many telly appearances each team has made.

This means that teams like Texas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska, which have the biggest football followings and appear on TV most-often, get a bigger ladle from the money pot than teams like Baylor, Iowa State, and Kansas State.

In terms of the spread of championships, the Big XII has not been balanced. Nine of the fourteen championships have been won by either Oklahoma or Texas, including that classic game played between Texas and Nebraska last weekend. Throw the Huskers into the championship count, and 11 of the 14 championships have gone to the big market teams.

With the divisional format in the Big XII, it is possible that an upset will occur where a "small" market team wins the overall championship over a "large" market team. Kansas State winning over Oklahoma in 2003 and, to a lesser extent, Colorado's 2001 defeat of Texas bear this out. But the spread over time tells a different story

http://thesportseconomist.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Newbie

House

Posted
Posted

I still think that revenue sharing will be back in the final CBA.

The owners dropped it so that they would have an upperhand in the contract negotiations. The players are reportedly wanting more than 60% of the pie. The owners balked. The union said "Hey an uncapped year isn't going to hurt the players that much.". So the owners did the one thing that put the ball back into thier court, canceled revenue sharing. That puts a hole in about 20+ owners pocket, a big hole. Not as many big contracts to go around without a cap if over half the teams are barely making ends meet.

The main reason I think all of this is because when they tried to drop revenue sharing last time the negotiated a lot of the owners flipped out. You really didn't hear much complaining about how it was going to kill teams like AZ, SF, TN, Buffalo, Jax, and the such. Thats because the owners know if they do reach an agreement on the CBA then revenue sharing will be back and if they don't it gives them an out with the fanbases as to why they are so cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pstall Newbie

pstall

Posted
  • Author
Posted

that 100 million dollars is just part of 6.5 billion

this is a really dumb comparison

to ask if you clicked on the link would be like asking Tiger if he likes to stay home on a Friday night while the family is way..

Don't confuse dollars with outcomes due to values being misplaced. I will explain that too you one day over a Newcastle or one of your Swedish organic beers.

Since a salary cap does not change the marginal value of players, it shouldn't ceteris paribus alter competitive balance.

Revenue sharing, on the other hand, reduces the difference between the amount of revenue teams can keep and, thus, can alter the value of players. Altering the system as the NFL appears to have done will, if it remains in place over the long haul, may create more of a disparity between "large" market and "small" market teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

to ask if you clicked on the link would be like asking Tiger if he likes to stay home on a Friday night while the family is way..

Don't confuse dollars with outcomes due to values being misplaced. I will explain that too you one day over a Newcastle or one of your Swedish organic beers.

cool then i'll teach you how to critically read an editorial and avoid confirmation bias

here's a start

Since a salary cap does not change the marginal value of players, it shouldn't ceteris paribus alter competitive balance.

Revenue sharing, on the other hand, reduces the difference between the amount of revenue teams can keep and, thus, can alter the value of players. Altering the system as the NFL appears to have done will, if it remains in place over the long haul, may create more of a disparity between "large" market and "small" market teams.

also he says the salary cap does not change the marginal value of players? it absolutely does that's dumb as hell

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

also that guys blog is funny

Resources tend to move to their most-valued use, unless of course it's notre dame where every top college coach falls all over themself to turn down a higher paying job because of tons of factors that people like pstall don't understand

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pstall Newbie

pstall

Posted
  • Author
Posted

also that guys blog is funny

Resources tend to move to their most-valued use, unless of course it's notre dame where every top college coach falls all over themself to turn down a higher paying job because of tons of factors that people like pstall don't understand

and you just plagarized his newest update to try to fit here. :smilielol5:

don't you have some lat workouts to do or use a co op laundromat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • JawnyBlaze
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By JawnyBlaze · Posted

      It wasn’t completely his fault, but outside of two throws and one or two scrambles he didn’t do much to help. His accuracy was all over the place, numerous passes that were placed poorly and didn’t give the receiver a good chance to catch the ball or do anything with it after. He also continues to display terrible pocket awareness. Even the sacks could have been avoided, they weren’t immediate like the pressure we got on Shough at times. Bryce just often has no feel for pressure and stands there waiting to get sacked after numerous seconds have passed. 
    • TylerDurden
      Possibly playoff affectng news

      By TylerDurden · Posted

      I really fuging hate this era in so many ways.  I look at those Adin Ross and Neon kids, and I just wonder why tf are they famous?  Why would anyone be desperate enough to gain THAT audience that they’d risk money, career, disciplinary action to go up there and associate with those fuging dweebs?  And back in my day, racist peers got their ass beat.  And not endorsing or approving bully culture, but checks and balances and all…  had those two been bullied, or at the very least humbled, they wouldn’t be famous and glorified for being the fuging idiots they are now.  It seriously pisses me off… they both have done and said multiple, openly racist stuff and major media keeps pushing them, talking about them, and propping them up… and then dummies like Puka who don’t need the platform or exposure lend their celebrity to them.  fuging idiot… and even the other streamers, I don’t get - Speed, Kai…  I don’t understand making nobodies famous at all, but there is at least entertainment value to some degree there, and I could see how young, impressionable kids would find them something to aspire to (sadly), or view as “cool.”  But Ross and Neon?  They’re just shitty, shitty nerds with big ass mouths. I’ve went back recently and watched some classics (in two very different eras and categories 😂)  like Robocop and Idiocracy.  And what I find fascinating is how both movies illustrate how stupid society became by showing what the citizenry is entertained by.  In both, society became anti-intellectual and the citizenry were entertained by lowest denominator, primal-type absurdity - poo like, “Ouch! My Balls!”  Or on Robocop, a guy is a watching a show where they are smashing cakes on ladies’ breasts and then a guy says a line as the camera zooms in like, “I’d buy that for a dollar!” and the audience thinks it’s hilarious.  That’s where I feel like we are now.  Like who watches that clip with Puka and thinks any of that poo is funny or cool?  If I was Puka, I’d honestly be wondering why tf I’m hanging out with these beta ass, racist, cretin ass weirdos.
    • CPF4LIFE
      If you can only fire ONE person before 2026....

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      7 wins this year and some of those against really good teams and yall think Canales might get fired? Lol Good luck getting a better coach in here if that happens.  
×
×
  • Create New...