Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

APB - Grand Theft Auto MMO thing..


Munkey

Recommended Posts

Don't you see the difference? Anyone can become a thug on the streets. If people think it's such an interesting concept, why not try the real thing? I'm just saying.

Anyone can become a Marine. I don't see the difference.. Yet the Call of Duty series is popular.

It's also why the GTA series is popular, it's a video game, to have fun in. Not to actually kill people like in Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto.

Let me guess, you're a bible thumping sissy do gooder? Or you're just trolling this thread, either one will make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This actually looks really cool. I wonder if it is developed by the same people who did GTA games? Either way, I'm likely gonna try it out.

I don't think it is, but if you watch some of their you tube podcasts linked on the front page they give tons of info about things.

http://www.apb.com/2009/10/14/apb-podcast-episode-12-ej-qa-4u/

That video (skip to 1:00) shows gameplay and explains how calling for backup works for the law enforcement side. How it sends out an APB to a nearby group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me guess, you're a bible thumping sissy do gooder?

Now that is something I've never been claimed to be before :D

I just think that it makes a horrible concept for an MMO, was it a regular game I would be perfectly fine with it.

But I'll leave you boys to your petty drooling. Y'all have a good day now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...