Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Amazing Baseball Stats Thread


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

Always loved reading Cy Young's stats...

Career

511-316, 2.63 ERA, 7356 IP, 749 CGs

In 1892 he was 36-12, 1.93 ERA and tossed 453 innings (48 complete games)... Most pitchers don't do that in 2 seasons...

Most pitchers don't sniff 48 complete games in their careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most pitchers don't sniff 48 complete games in their careers.

He was FOURTH in complete games that year... heh

Gus Weyhing led the league that year with 3 saves... lol Not that they really kept stats on those back then... Bill Hutchinson started SEVENTY games that season... And led the league with SIXTY SEVEN complete games, and 622 innings pitched... wow... (typing this as I read the league stats)

Totally different era... amazing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found this too:

He developed conditioning habits that allowed him to stay remarkably injury-free, even in an era when pitchers were expected to throw many, many more innings than they do these days. In 1895 he began throwing what he called a "slow-ball" in order to reduce the burden on his arm, and found that it actually became an equally effective pitch for getting batters out - in short, Cy Young invented the change-up. For the first three weeks of spring training he wouldn't throw at all, devoting all his time to conditioning his legs. Young once gave his view on the proper warm-up:

"I never warmed up ten, fifteen minutes before a game like most pitchers do. I'd loosen up, three, four minutes. Five at the outside. And I never went to the bullpen. Oh, I'd relieve all right, plenty of times, but I went right from the bench to the box, and I'd take a few warm-up pitches and be ready. Then I had good control. I aimed to make the batter hit the ball, and I threw as few pitches as possible. That's why I was able to work every other day."

http://ask.metafilter.com/69647/Why-was-Cy-Young-so-awesome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which of the following was NOT a major league team in 1901?

A. Boston Beaneaters

B. Chicago Orphans

C. Milwaukee Brewers

D. New York Yankees

E. Brooklyn Superbas

It's gonna be the Brewers, but I have to admit I had to look it up... The Chicago Orphans and Brooklyn Superbas just sounded way too made up to me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's gonna be the Brewers, but I have to admit I had to look it up... The Chicago Orphans and Brooklyn Superbas just sounded way too made up to me...

It's actually the New York Yankees. There was a Milwaukee Brewers way back then, but no Yankees, according to this baseball trivia site I found that showed the standings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually the New York Yankees. There was a Milwaukee Brewers way back then, but no Yankees, according to this baseball trivia site I found that showed the standings.

Most interesting! I did not know that... I looked up the NYY wiki and found this even more interesting:

One of the American League's eight charter franchises, the club was founded in Baltimore, Maryland in 1901 as the Baltimore Orioles, and moved to New York City in 1903, becoming known as the New York Highlanders before being officially renamed the "Yankees" in 1913

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Yankees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is pre-steroids, too....

In 1972, Steve Carlton was 27-10 with a 1.97 era. with 30 complete games, 346.1 innings pitched, and 310 K's!

Here's the kicker: The Phils that year were 59-97.

Lefty is one of the best pitchers of all time. One of my first real memories of Phillies baseball (along with Tug Mcgraw). Last NL pitcher to win 25 games or 300 innings in a season. He also mastered the balk......no one will ever break his record of 90. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
×
×
  • Create New...